Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Appeal 184 of 2011 |
---|---|
Parties: | Joseph Abtalia v Republic |
Date Delivered: | 09 Oct 2013 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Mombasa |
Case Action: | Judgment |
Judge(s): | Martin Muya |
Citation: | Joseph Abtalia v Republic [2013] eKLR |
Case History: | From original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 214 of 2011 of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Taveta – Hon. C.N. Ndegwa - SRM |
Court Division: | Criminal |
County: | Mombasa |
History Docket No: | Criminal Case 214 of 2011 |
History Magistrate: | C.N. Ndegwa - SRM |
History Advocates: | One party or some parties represented |
History County: | Taita Taveta |
Case Outcome: | Allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2011
JOSEPH ABTALIA …......…...............................................….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……….……....................................................…RESPONDENT
(From original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 214 of 2011 of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Taveta – Hon. C.N. Ndegwa - SRM)
JUDGMENT
JOSEPH ABTALIA hereinafter referred to as the Appellant was Convicted and Sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment on 1st and 3rd alternative counts of handling stolen property contrary to section 322(2) of the Penal Code. It was ordered that the Sentence do ran consecutively.
Section 37 of the Penal Code provides,
“where a person after Conviction for an offence is Convicted of another offence, either before Sentence is passed upon him under the first Conviction or before the expiration of that Sentence, any Sentence, there than a Sentence of death, which is passed upon him under the subsequent Conviction shall be extended after the expiration of the former Sentence, unless the Court directs that it shall be executed concurrently with the former Sentence or any part thereof”.
In the present case the handling of the stolen property though on two different dates was related to one case of burglary and stealing. The Sentences therefore ought to have run concurrently but not consecutively.
The Sentence is therefore varied and or altered to read concurrent sentence but not to run consecutively.
The effect is that the appellant will serve five years imprisonment but not ten years imprisonment.
To that extent only does this appeal succeed.
Judgment delivered dated and signed this 9th day of October, 2013.
…...................
M. MUYA
JUDGE
9TH OCTOBER, 2013
In the presence of:-
Learned state Counsel Miss Mwaura
The Appellant present
Court clerk Musundi