Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Application Nai. 405 of 2001 (215/2002 UR) |
---|---|
Parties: | Kenya Bus Services Limited v Muna Isaack |
Date Delivered: | 06 Dec 2001 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nairobi |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Samuel Elikana Ondari Bosire, Emmanuel Okello O'Kubasu, Abdulrasul Ahmed Lakha |
Citation: | Kenya Bus Services Limited v Muna Isaack [2001] eKLR |
Case History: | (Application for stay of execution pending appeal from the Judgment & Orders of the High Court of Kenya at Meru (Justice Tuiyot) dated the 20th day of June, 2001 in H.C.C.C. NO. 117 OF 1998) |
Court Division: | Civil |
Parties Profile: | Corporation v Individual |
County: | Nairobi |
History Docket No: | H.C.C.C. No. 1176 of 1998 |
History Judges: | Francis Tuiyott |
History County: | Meru |
Case Outcome: | Application Allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: LAKHA, BOSIRE & O'KUBASU, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 405 OF 2001 (215/2002 UR)
BETWEEN
KENYA BUS SERVICES LIMITED ..............................APPLICANT
AND
MUNA ISAACK ........................................................RESPONDENT
(Application for stay of execution pending appeal from the
in
H.C.C.C. NO. 117 OF 1998)
RULING OF THE COURT:
This is an application for a stay under rule 5(2)(b) of the Rules of this Court. It is made by the unsuccessful defendant. The plaintiff was awarded about 1.2 million general damages and special damages.
The costs of this application shall be costs in the appeal.
Made at Nairobi this 6th day of December, 2001.
A.A. LAKHA
………………………….
S.E.O. BOSIRE
………………………….
E. O'KUBASU
…………………………..
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Judgment & Orders of the High Court of Kenya at Meru
(Justice Tuiyot) dated the 20th day of June, 2001
*****************
We are prepared to assume, without deciding, that the applicant has an arguable appeal. We are also satisfied that there is a genuine risk of the appeal being rendered nugatory.We prefer to accept the proposal of Mr. Kariuki for a conditional order. Accordingly we grant a stay conditional upon the applicant depositing half the decretal amount within 21 days and paying the balance to the plaintiff also within 21 days failing which this order of stay shall lapse.
JUDGE OF APPEAL
JUDGE OF APPEAL
JUDGE OF APPEAL