Criminal Case 11 of 2008

Help

Advanced Search mode is suitable for finding a particular case when you have details that describe the case at hand e.g. (names of parties, case number, case year etc).
To find a case according to its meta data (names of parties, case number, and date of delivery, case year etc) one need not fill in all the fields. You may use any one or more search criteria; search using whatever information you have..

Download: PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML Show Metadata

REPUBLIC v STEPHEN TOROITICH CHEMAIYO [2011] eKLR

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Criminal Case 11 of 2008
Parties:	REPUBLIC v STEPHEN TOROITICH CHEMAIYO
Date Delivered:	07 Dec 2011
Case Class:	Criminal
Court:	High Court at Eldoret
Case Action:	Ruling
Judge(s):	Festus Azangalala
Citation:	REPUBLIC v STEPHEN TOROITICH CHEMAIYO [2011] eKLR
Case Summary:	..
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT ELDORET

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 11 OF 2008

REPUBLIC...................................................................................................PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

STEPHEN TOROITICH CHEMAIYO....................................................................ACCUSED

RULING

In the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt -Vs- Republic [1957] E.A 332, a prima facie case was defined as one on which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence. At this stage, the court is not required to decide finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit or whether, if believed, it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively,-that final determination can only properly be made when the case for the defence has been heard.

I have considered the evidence which the prosecution has adduced in this case and I am satisfied that the same has demonstrated a prima facie case against the accused as defined in Bhatt -Vs- Republic [supra]. The accused in the other words has a case to answer and is put on his defence.

It is so ordered.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 7^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011

F. AZANGALALA

JUDGE

Read in the presence of :-

Mr. Kabaka for the State and

Mr. Okara for the Accused.

F. AZANGALALA

JUDGE

7^TH DECEMBER, 2011.

Download PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML

Please enter advanced search options

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Except for some material which is expressly stated to be under a specified Creative Commons license, the contents of this website are in the public domain and free from any copyright restrictions

Case Search

Criminal Case 11 of 2008

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options