Civil Appeal 17 of 2005

Help

Advanced Search mode is suitable for finding a particular case when you have details that describe the case at hand e.g. (names of parties, case number, case year etc).
To find a case according to its meta data (names of parties, case number, and date of delivery, case year etc) one need not fill in all the fields. You may use any one or more search criteria; search using whatever information you have..

Download: PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML Show Metadata

BEATRICE GICUKU v JAPHET NGURU [2011] eKLR

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Civil Appeal 17 of 2005
Parties:	BEATRICE GICUKU v JAPHET NGURU
Date Delivered:	28 Jul 2011
Case Class:	Civil
Court:	High Court at Embu
Case Action:	Judgment
Judge(s):	Wanjiru Karanja
Citation:	BEATRICE GICUKU v JAPHET NGURU [2011] eKLR
Case Summary:	..
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT

AT EMBU

HIGH COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2005

BEATRICE GICUKU::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::APPELLANT

VERSUS

JAPHET NGURU::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

According to the Amended memorandum of Appeal dated 22.6.2006, this appeal arises from

“The Report dated 30.9.04 filed by the District Surveyor

on 4.10.21004, and the Report dated 16.9.2004 filed

by the District Land Registrar, Embu on 20.9.2001

following the orders of the learned SRM,

R. M Mochache on 22.4.2004 and 16.9.2004 in

Embu PM’s Award case No. 53 of 2002”

The Appellant has listed 3 grounds of Appeal which I need not repeat for purposes of this short judgment. The Appeal proceeded by way of written submissions which I have read and carefully considered. I must say from the outset that I am in full agreement with the brief submission (1/2 page) of counsel for the Respondent. He has in his short submission just restated and clarified the position in law relating to Appeals. There is no competent Appeal before me on which I can be called upon to make a determination on merit.

As rightly submitted by counsel for the Respondent, an Appeal can only be against a “Decree” of “Order” of the court. It cannot lie against a report filed in court or any other document unless such a report or proceeding is first reduced to a decree or order of the court. It is such a decree or order that is then certified and filed with the Memorandum of Appeal pursuant to order 42(4) of the Civil Procedure rules (as amended)

There cannot be an Appeal to this court against a surveyor’s or Land Registrar’s report. The fact that the magistrate directed that any party who was dissatisfied with the said reports can move to the High Court on appeal against the said reports was a misdirection. The magistrate cannot confer jurisdiction to this court or to his court where none exists in law.

That directive was made in total ignorance of the law. As said earlier, this Appeal is totally incompetent and I must dismiss the same which I hereby do. The Appeal is therefore dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

W. KARANJA

JUDGE

Signed by the above but dated and delivered at Embu this 28^th day of July 2011

JUDGE

Download PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML

Please enter advanced search options

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Except for some material which is expressly stated to be under a specified Creative Commons license, the contents of this website are in the public domain and free from any copyright restrictions

Case Search

Civil Appeal 17 of 2005

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options