Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Application 161 of 2010 |
---|---|
Parties: | Yasmin Abdulkari T/A Y.A. Ali Advocates v Southern Credit Banking Corporation Ltd |
Date Delivered: | 12 Oct 2010 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nairobi |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Moijo Matayia Ole Keiwua |
Citation: | Yasmin Abdulkari T/A Y.A. Ali Advocates v Southern Credit Banking Corporation Ltd [2010] eKLR |
Advocates: | Mr Mutugi for the respondent |
Case History: | (Application for extension of time within which the notice of appeal dated 4th May 2010 in an intended appeal against the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Azangalala, J) in High Court Commercial Civil Suit No. 34 should be lodged and served and that the notice of appeal dated 4th May 2010 and lodged in the High Court on 11th May 2010 be deemed as lodged within time in H.C.C.C. NO. 34 OF 2009 in H.C.C.C. NO. 34 OF 2009 |
Court Division: | Civil |
Parties Profile: | Individual v Corporation |
County: | Nairobi |
Advocates: | Mr Mutugi for the respondent |
History Docket No: | 34 of 2009 |
History Judges: | Festus Azangalala |
History Advocates: | One party or some parties represented |
History County: | Mombasa |
Case Outcome: | Application allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
AT NAIROBI
YASMIN ABDULKARI T/A Y.A. ALI ADVOCATES.........................APPLICANTS
AND
(Application for extension of time within which the notice of appeal dated 4th May 2010 in an intended appeal against the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Azangalala, J) in High Court Commercial Civil Suit No. 34 should be lodged and served and that the notice of appeal dated 4th May 2010 and lodged in the High Court on 11th May 2010 be deemed as lodged within time.
Mr Mutugi, learned counsel for the respondent not opposing the application, the notice of appeal is deemed to have been lodged in the superior court on the 5th May 2010. On the other hand, the Notice of appeal is also deemed to have been served on the respondent within the time allowed by rule 76(1) of the Court’s Rule. The applicant to pay the respondent’s costs of the application in any event.
M. OLE KEIWUA
……………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL