Criminal Appeal 42 of 2008

Help

Advanced Search mode is suitable for finding a particular case when you have details that describe the case at hand e.g. (names of parties, case number, case year etc).
To find a case according to its meta data (names of parties, case number, and date of delivery, case year etc) one need not fill in all the fields. You may use any one or more search criteria; search using whatever information you have..

Download: PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML Show Metadata

REPUBLIC v GILBERT MUTAI & another [2010] eKLR

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Criminal Appeal 42 of 2008
Parties:	REPUBLIC v GILBERT MUTAI & HILLARY KIPROTICH
Date Delivered:	23 Nov 2010
Case Class:	Criminal
Court:	High Court at Kericho
Case Action:	Ruling
Judge(s):	George Benedict Maina Kariuki
Citation:	REPUBLIC v GILBERT MUTAI & another [2010] eKLR
Case Summary:	..
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT KERICHO

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 42 OF 2008

REPUBLIC..............................................................................................................PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

GILBERT MUTAI .....................................................................................................1^ST ACCUSED

HILLARY KIPROTICH.............................................................................................2^ND ACCUSED

RULING

The accused are charged with murder under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge are that the accused “… on the 29^th day of October, 2008 at Kusumek village in Buret District within Rift Valley Province jointly murdered STEPHEN KIPNGENO KORIR”

I have perused the evidence adduced in support of the charge. I have come to the conclusion that there is a case to answer. I therefore put the accused on their defence. The accused are at liberty to remain mum or to testify on oath or to make an unsworn statement from the dock. Each of them can also call witnesses. The defence counsel shall let the court know the course the accused intend to take after which the court shall give a hearing date for the trial.

DATED at KERICHO this 23^rd day of November, 2010

G.B.M. KARIUKI, SC

RESIDENT JUDGE

COUNSEL APPEARING

Mr. K.L. Kipyegon Advocate, instructed by Messrs Kipyegon & Co. Advocates appeared for the accused

Mr. Kiprop, State Counsel from the Attorney General’s Chambers appeared for the State

Court Clerk – Mr. Koech

Download PDF DOC DOCX PDF With Metadata Docx With Metadata XML

Please enter advanced search options

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Except for some material which is expressly stated to be under a specified Creative Commons license, the contents of this website are in the public domain and free from any copyright restrictions

Case Search

Criminal Appeal 42 of 2008

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options