Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Succession Cause 1 of 2008 |
---|---|
Parties: | TUNAI NAFULA BARASA v NYONGESA SICHANGI & 2 others |
Date Delivered: | 02 Dec 2010 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Bungoma |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Florence Nyaguthii Muchemi |
Citation: | TUNAI NAFULA BARASA v NYONGESA SICHANGI & 2 others [2010] eKLR |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT BUNGOMA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.1 OF 2008
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE BARASA SICHANGI KIMASWA (DECEASED)
AND
TUNAI NAFULA BARASA..................................ADMINISTRATOR
AND
NYONGESA SICHANGI...............................................OBJECTOR
GABRIEL WEKESA BARASA....................................OBJECTOR
CLEOPHAS MUTAMBO MAJI...................................OBJECTOR
RULING
This isa ruling on a preliminary objection by the objectors Nyongesa Sichangi, Gabriel W. Barasa and Cleophas M. Maji dated 24/04/2010 seeking for striking out of the petitioner’s application for confirmation of grant. The reasons given are that the petitioner has included names of strangers as beneficiaries of the estate and disinherited the objectors.
I have perused the record. The court had directed the petitioner to file the application for confirmation of grant and the objectors to file an affidavit of protest against confirmation. This was after talking to the parties and finding that they were unlikely to agree on the way forward.
I do not think that annulling the grant is the right way to go. This is because the petitioner is the widow of the deceased and there is no question of her being the right person to administer the estate. Striking out the application for confirmation of grant is not the right thing to do. The reason being that that kind of action will result in retreating as far as this matter is concerned.
The preliminary objection raises no points of law to warrant the annulment of the grant or the striking out of the application. I therefore reject it accordingly.
I direct that parties take directions in this case and proceed to have the case heard as to the distribution of the deceased’s estate.
F. N. MUCHEMI
JUDGE
Ruling dated and delivered on the 2nd day of December 2010 in the presence of the Petitioner and objectors.
F. N. MUCHEMI
JUDGE