Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | crim app 321 of 02 |
---|---|
Parties: | PETER KIPRUGUT MARITIM vs REPUBLIC |
Date Delivered: | 24 Oct 2003 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Kisumu |
Case Action: | |
Judge(s): | Tanui B K |
Citation: | PETER KIPRUGUT MARITIM vs REPUBLIC[2003] eKLR |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 321 OF 2002
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………..RESPONDENT
The appellant was charged, tried and convicted of the offence of stealing stock contrary to section 278 of the Penal Code. He has now appealed against his conviction and sentence as indicated by our Mr. Mutai from the state the Court convicted the appellant of the offence by the application of the doctrine of recent possession when the dates of the theft and when he was found with the animals were not before the Court. Secondly the appellant had given explanation of having been found in possession. There was no evidence that Andrea Arap Kirui who had allegedly employed the appellant to drive the animals was interviewed and called as a witness.
Bearing those factors in mind I am not satisfied that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal is therefore allowed and the conviction of the appellant is therefore quashed. The sentence is set aside and it is directed that he be released forthwith.
Dated and delivered this 24th October, 2003.