Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Misc Civil Appli 32 of 2009 |
---|---|
Parties: | ABEL NYAMICHABA KENYORU v PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, MINISTRY OF IMMIGRATION & ATTORNEY GENERAL |
Date Delivered: | 25 Feb 2009 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) |
Case Action: | |
Judge(s): | Joseph Gregory Nyamu |
Citation: | ABEL NYAMICHABA KENYORU v PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & 2 others [2009] eKLR |
Case Summary: | [Ruling]Judicial Review – application seeking leave to apply for judicial review orders – application for leave, if granted, to operate as stay – whether there were arguable points to go to the next stage – whether leave should operate as stay |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc Civil Appli 32 of 2009
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY:
ABEL NYAMICHABA KENYORU .............................................. APPLICANT
VERSUS
PERMANENT SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS .............................. 1ST RESPONDENT
MINISTRY OF IMMIGRATION ...................................... 2ND RESPONDENT
ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................. 3RD RESPONDENT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CANCELLATION OF THE DIPLOMATIC PASSPORT NO DOO9176
CONTRARY TO THE KENYA FOREIGN SERVICE REGULATION 2000
RULING
When this matter came before me under a certificate of urgency I ordered that the application for leave should be heard inter-parties.
I have since heard the parties and formed the view that there are several arguable points to go to the next stage.
This being the threshold stage, I have guarded myself from making any findings or holdings on any point despite lengthy submissions having been made by Counsel.
I therefore grant leave in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the application dated 20th January 2009. I decline to order that leave operates as stay as prayed or at all because the effect of granting stay would be to grant final relief without hearing the matter on merit. I hold that the interests of justice will be served better by having the substantive application for judicial review fastracked for hearing. In this regard I direct that the application be filed and served within 10 days. Upon compliance with this direction the matter be mentioned on 11th March, 2009 at 9 00 a.m for directions.
Costs in the cause.
DATED and delivered at Nairobi this 25th day of February, 2009.
J.G. NYAMU
JUDGE