Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | crim app 100 of 00 |
|---|---|
| Parties: | Jeremiah Mogire Mbeche v Republic |
| Date Delivered: | 22 Nov 2000 |
| Case Class: | Criminal |
| Court: | Court of Appeal at Kisumu |
| Case Action: | Judgment |
| Judge(s): | Johnson Evan Gicheru, Akilano Molade Akiwumi, Moijo Matayia Ole Keiwua |
| Citation: | Jeremiah Mogire Mbeche v Republic [2000] eKLR |
| Case History: | (Appeal from a Sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Hon. Mr. Justice Waweru) dated 31st August,1999 in H.C.CR. CASE NO. 37 OF 1999) |
| Court Division: | Criminal |
| County: | Kisumu |
| History Docket No: | H.C.CR. CASE NO. 37 OF 1999 |
| History Judges: | Hatari Peter George Waweru |
| History County: | Kisii |
| Case Outcome: | Appeal dismissed |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
JEREMIAH MOGIRE MBECHE ...............APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ...........................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:
In his notes on sentence, the learned trial judge observed that it was easy to understand the appellant's anger on discovering that his wife, now deceased, stole a large sum of money from him. He also observed that that not withstanding, the appellant had no right to viciously attack the deceased in order to extract a confession from her.
The deceased had taken Kshs.6,000/= from the appellant's coat pocket and had given it to her cousin called John. On questioning by the appellant, she had refused to own up the taking of that money the result of which he assaulted her with a piece of firewood on the head inflicting serious head injuries which resulted in her death soon thereafter. It was during that assault that the deceased confessed having taken the money in question and given it to her cousin.
The mitigation proffered on behalf of the appellant by his counsel in the superior court after his plea of guilty and conviction for the offence of manslaughter was similar to what has been urged before us by counsel now appearing for him. This mitigation centres around the welfare of his 14 children now left without anyone to fend for them. However, even taking into account the plight of the said children, it is important to note that this is a Court of law and not of sympathy. The sentence of 7 years imprisonment meted against the appellant was legal and in the circumstances of the facts before the learned trial judge it was not manifestly excessive him having taken into account all the mitigating factors proffered before him on behalf of the appellant. We are unable to fault the learned trial judge in this regard and in the result we can find no merit in the appellant's appeal. The same is therefore dismissed.
Dated at Kisumu this 22nd day of November, 2000.
J. E. GICHERU
........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A. M. AKIWUMI
.......................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
M. KEIWUA
..........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Please Wait. Searching ...