Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Case 1069 of 2005 (OS) |
---|---|
Parties: | LILIAN WANJIRU MWANGI v S. MUTHAURA KIOME, JOHN K. MWORIA |
Date Delivered: | 22 Jun 2007 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Hatari Peter George Waweru |
Citation: | LILIAN WANJIRU MWANGI v S. MUTHAURA KIOME & ANOTHER [2007] eKLR |
Case Summary: | [Ruling] - CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE- Execution-Attachment-objection proceedings-an application by the objector challenging the attachment of motor vehicle as the vehicle belonged to him- duty of the auctioneer to ascertain that the property to be attached belongs to the judgment-debtor-whether the application could be allowed-Order 21, rules 56 and 57 of the Civil Procedure Rules |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
LILIAN WANJIRU MWANGI …………......…………….PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
S. MUTHAURA KIOME …………….………….1ST DEFENDANT
JOHN K. MWORIA …………….……………….2ND DEFENDANT
AND
BEATRICE NKUENE MUTAHI …..……………1ST OBJECTOR
VELMA MWENDWA ……………..……………..2ND OBJECTOR
R U L I N G
This is an application (chamber summons dated 16th April, 2007) challenging the attachment of motor vehicle Regn. Number KAW 537H in execution of decree herein. It is brought under Order 21, rules 56 and 57 of the Civil Procedure Rules. At the hearing of the application it was conceded by the Plaintiff/Decree-Holder that the motor vehicle belongs to the 2nd Objector, VELMA MWENDWA, and that it should never have been attached. In a preliminary ruling therefore, I ordered that the motor vehicle be released forthwith and unconditionally to the 2nd Objector. It is not quite clear why the 1st Objector, BEATRICE NKUENE MUTAHI, joined in the application.
It is the duty of an auctioneer to ascertain that the property to be attached belongs to the judgment-debtor. It is apparent that the auctioneer in the instant case did not do so in respect to the motor vehicle Regn. Number KAW 537H.
I will in the circumstances allow the application in prayers 2 and 3. I will also award the costs of the application to the 2nd Objector as against the Plaintiff/Decree-Holder. The issue of the auctioneer’s charges will have to be sorted out as between the auctioneer and the Plaintiff/Decree-Holder. Those will be the orders of the court.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2007
H. P. G. WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2007