Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Appeal 57 of 2007 |
---|---|
Parties: | DANIEL JUMA MUKWEI v REPUBLIC |
Date Delivered: | 07 Mar 2008 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Eldoret |
Case Action: | Judgment |
Judge(s): | Kaburu Bauni |
Citation: | DANIEL JUMA MUKWEI v REPUBLIC [2008] eKLR |
Advocates: | Mr. Chirchir for the state; |
Case History: | (From the original conviction and sentence of CM’S CR,CA,BI,4035 OF 2004 BY G.A. MMASI (SRM) |
Advocates: | Mr. Chirchir for the state; |
Case Summary: | Criminal practice and procedure - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Penal code section 359 |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
DANIEL JUMA MUKWEI:…………………ACCUSED
VERSUS
REPUBLIC:……………………………..RESPONDENT
(From the original conviction and sentence of CM’S CR,CA,BI,4035 OF 2004 BY G.A. MMASI (SRM)
JUDGEMENT
The appellant DANIEL JUMA MUKWEI was jointly charged with SAMSON SIMWA MIUSIKO the appellant in Eld. HC.CRA.NO.56 OF 2007 for the offence of being in possession of fake currency contrary to section 359 penal Code in that on 22nd May 2004 at Turbo Trading Centre jointly were found in possession of 500 notes knowing them to be forged. They were found guilty and jailed for five years.
The two appeals arises form the same case – Eld. CM.CR.NO.403 OF 2004. Ideally the two should have been consolidated for hearing but due to a mix up they were not. However the state counsel adopted his submission in this appeal to that of No.56 of 2004 and this judgment therefore applied to both.
Mr. Chirchir the learned state counsel told the court that he was conceding to the appeal as the amended charge sheet was never read to the appellant.
I have considered the evidence and I quite concur with the learned state counsel. It seems that the charges were amended on 18th January 2005 but they were never read to the appellant. Infact it was not even clear if the amendment was allowed but from the evidence it is quite clear having proceedings on basis of the amended charge sheet. Appellant never pleaded to those new charges and this was unprocedural and not curable.
In the circumstances I allow the appeals, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed.
Dated and Delivered at Eldoret on 7th March,2008.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
C/C - David
Mr. Chirchir for State.
Appellants present in person.