Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Appeal 81 of 1994 |
---|---|
Parties: | David Lekanoi Lesepe v Republic |
Date Delivered: | 25 Sep 1996 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nakuru |
Case Action: | Judgment |
Judge(s): | Johnson Evan Gicheru, Philip Kiptoo Tunoi, Abdulrasul Ahmed Lakha |
Citation: | David Lekanoi Lesepe v Republic [1996] eKLR |
Case History: | (Appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Lady Justice R. Nambuye) dated 7th July, 1993, in Criminal Case No. 674 of 1992) |
County: | Nakuru |
History Docket No: | Criminal Case No. 674 of 1992 |
History Judges: | Roselyn Naliaka Nambuye |
History County: | Nakuru |
Case Outcome: | Dismissed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 81 of 1994
DAVID LEKANOI LESEPE…………………………….......................…………….APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC……………………………………………...................………………RESPONDENT
(Appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Lady Justice R.
Nambuye) dated 7th July, 1993,
IN
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 674 OF 1992)
*******************************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant David Lekanoi Lesepe pleaded guilty to the alternative charge of Handling Stolen Property contrary to section 322(2) of the Penal Code. He was convicted and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. His appeal to the High Court (Nambuye, J.) was summarily rejected under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The issue of law raised in this appeal is whether or not the learned judge could summarily reject the petition of appeal under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant having pleaded guilty unequivocally he could not be heard to deny the conviction. The other ground relates to severity of sentence upon which an appeal may be summarily rejected. We see no other circumstances which could raise any doubt about the correctness of the summary rejection.
This appeal is dismissed. We so order.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 25th September, 1996.
J. E. GICHERU
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P. K. TUNOI
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.A. LAKHA
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR