Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Appeal 233 of 1996 |
---|---|
Parties: | Kimanzi Mboo v David Mulwa Muthusi |
Date Delivered: | 25 Sep 1997 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nairobi |
Case Action: | Judgment |
Judge(s): | Riaga Samuel Cornelius Omolo, Gurbachan Singh Pall, Richard Otieno Kwach |
Citation: | Kimanzi Mboo v David Mulwa Muthusi [1997] eKLR |
Case History: | (An appeal from the decree/judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos(Hon. Mwera J) delivered on 11th September, 1996 in H.C.C.MISC. APPLICATION NO. 52 OF 1996 |
Court Division: | Civil |
County: | Nairobi |
History Docket No: | H.C.C. Misc. Application 52 of 1996 |
History Judges: | John Wycliffe Mwera |
History County: | Machakos |
Case Outcome: | Appeal allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL 233 OF 1996
KIMANZI MBOO.................................................................APPELLANT
AND
DAVID MULWA MUTHUSI.................................................RESPONDENT
(An appeal from the decree/judgment of the High Court of Kenya
at Machakos(Hon. Mwera J) delivered on 11th September, 1996
in
H.C.C.MISC. APPLICATION NO. 52 OF 1996
********************************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The respondent applied on 9.5.1996 for leave to apply for an order of certiorari to quash an award made on 9.10.1994 by the land Dispute Tribunal. Under the Law Reform Act as well as under order 53 r. 2, no application for leave can be entertained unless it is made within six months of the date of the award or order. The application for leave having bee granted when it had been made well out of the prescribed period of six months, no leave could have been granted. The order for leave is therefore a nullity and so is the order quashing the award. The appeal is therefore allowed with no order as to costs.
Dated this 25th day of September 1997.
R. O. KWACH
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
R. S. C. OMOLO
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
G. S. PALL
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR