Please Wait. Searching ...
|Case Number:||Civil Appeal 73 of 1996|
|Parties:||Nyatwang’a Israel v Alloys Otachi|
|Date Delivered:||22 Nov 1996|
|Court:||Court of Appeal at Kisumu|
|Judge(s):||Gurbachan Singh Pall, Philip Kiptoo Tunoi, Richard Otieno Kwach|
|Citation:||Nyatwang’a Israel v Alloys Otachi  eKLR|
|Case History:||(An appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Justice Mbaluto) dated 19th August, 1994 IN H. C. C. C. NO. 62 OF 1990)|
|History Docket No:||H. C. C. C. NO. 62 OF 1990|
|History Judges:||Tom Mbaluto|
|Disclaimer:||The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information|
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
CIVIL APPEAL 73 OF 1996
NYATWANG’A ISRAEL …………………….APPELLANT
ALLOYS OTACHI ……...….....……………RESP0NDENT
(An appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Justice Mbaluto)
dated 19th August, 1994
H. C. C. C. NO. 62 OF 1990)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Alloys Otachi (the respondent) sued Nyatwanga Israel (the appellant) in the superior court seeking among other reliefs an order that Plot No. 3 Daraja Mbili (the suit premises) be subdivided into 2 equal halves and one half be registered in the name of the respondent and the other half in name of the appellant; and an injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with the respondent’s quiet enjoyment of the part of the suit premises occupied.
According to the plaint filed on 20th March, 1990, the suit premises originally belonged to the appellant but in 1951 he sold half of it to the respondent at a consideration of Shs.500/=. The suit premises were then registered in the joint names of both parties. On 1st January, 1990, the appellant, with the assistance of his sons, forcibly evicted the respondent from the suit premises and took possession of the part previously occupied by the respondent. A defence was filed on behalf of the appellant on 28th June, 1990 in which sale to the respondent was denied although the appellant admitted that the suit premises were registered in the joint names of the appellant and the respondent. It was averred in the defence that such registration had been procured by fraud on the part of the respondent and the local authority of the area but no particulars of the alleged fraud were given.
The case was heard by Mbaluto, J. who after considering both oral and documentary evidence gave judgment for the respondent. He found evidence of joint registration in a Plot Card issued by African District Council of Kisii dated 24th November, 1964 according to which the proprietors of the suit premises were named as Nyatwanga Israel and Alois Otachi. The judge also found that the respondent had over the years developed his part of the suit premises by adding 6 residential units which he rented out. The respondent received a monthly income of shs.1,350/= from these unlawful eviction in January, 1990.
In a desperate attempt to show that he was the exclusive owner of the suit premises, the appellant produced a document purportedly issued by Kisii Town Council to the effect that he was the sole owner of the plot. But the judge rejected that document, because is was a document of dubious authenticity being neither dated nor signed. There was also evidence by the Gusii County Council Surveyor of joint allocation of the suit premises to both the appellant and the respondent.
In the end, Mr. Mogikoyo, for the appellant, has failed to convince us that the Judge erred in any way and that being our view of the matter, the appeal must fail and is hereby ordered to be dismissed with costs. We also order the appellant to restore possession to the respondent and to pay to the respondent Shs.113,400/= being his loss of income up to and including 31st December, 1996. To bring this dispute to an end we hereby direct Gusii County Council to subdivide the suit premises into 2 equal halves and issue each party his own title. The respondent will also have the costs of this appeal.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 22nd day of November, 1996
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P. K. TUNOI
JUDGE OF APPEAL
G. S. PALL
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.