Civil Suit 24 of 2006

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Civil Suit 24 of 2006
Parties:	Ngungu v Mwengi
Date Delivered:	04 Jul 2023
Case Class:
Court:	High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:	Ruling
Judge(s):	Eric Kennedy Okumu Ogola
Citation:	Ngungu v Mwengi (Civil Suit 24 of 2006) [2023] KEHC 22094 (KLR) (Family) (4 July 2023) (Ruling)
Advocates:	Ms. Wangari h/b Mr. Mwanzia for For Petitioner
Court Division:	Family
County:	Nairobi
Advocates:	Ms. Wangari h/b Mr. Mwanzia for For Petitioner
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Ngungu v Mwengi (Civil Suit 24 of 2006) [2023] KEHC 22094 (KLR) (Family) (4 July 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 22094 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Family

Civil Suit 24 of 2006

EKO Ogola, J

July 4, 2023

Between

Margaret Mwikali Ngungu

Applicant

and

Elijah Ngungu Mwengi

Respondent

Ruling

1.The Application before the Court is dated September 15, 2020. The Applicant prays for the following:-a.Spent;b.That the Honorable Court be pleased to review its Orders made on the November 26, 2010 by specifically amending Order 1 thereto by adding the following words after the word Kibwezi, that is to say:“being Kiboko ‘B’ Settlement Scheme Plot Number 232 and 1260 (Combined)”c.That the costs of this application be provided for.

2.The Application is based on the grounds set forth therein and the Supporting Affidavit of the Applicant, Margaret Mwikali Ngungu.

3.It is averred that the Judgment on record vesting the plots to the Applicant mentions plots in Kibwezi. After the vesting orders were made, the Applicant avers that he subsequently filed an application for review dated June 3, 2015 to review the Orders dated November 26, 2010, but the said Application was dismissed on the grounds that there is a pending Appeal. The Appeal has since been determined in favour of the Applicant. The plot Number for the plot in Kibwezi has since been established and unless the Orders sought are granted, the land will be wasted and invaded by trespassers.

4.The Application is unopposed.

Determination

5.I have considered the Application, the Supporting Affidavit and the Annexure. Section 80 gives the power of review and Order 45 sets out the rules. The rules lay down the jurisdiction and scope of review limiting it to the following grounds;(a)discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence, was not within the knowledge of the applicant or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or the order made or;(b)on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or(c)for any other sufficient reason and whatever the ground there is a requirement that the application has to be made without unreasonable delay.

6.Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 provides as follows: -“Any person who considers himself aggrieved—a.by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed by this Act, but from which no appeal has been preferred; orb.by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed by this Act, may apply for a review of judgment to the court which passed the decree or made the order, and the court may make such order thereon as it thinks fit.”

7.Order 45 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 provides as follows: -“1.(1)Any person considering himself aggrieved—a.by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed, but from which no appeal has been preferred; orb.by a decree or order from which no appeal is hereby allowed, and who from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or the order made, or on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or for any other sufficient reason, desires to obtain a review of the decree or order, may apply for a review of judgment to the court which passed the decree or made the order without unreasonable delay.”

8.Order (1) of this court’s order dated November 23, 2010 states as follows:“That an Order be and is herby issued vesting the suit properties i.e. LR No 15065/17, off Ndalat Road, Karen Hardy, LR No Nairobi/Block 72/361 Onyoka Estate, Langata (House No C30), the piece of land in Kibwezi and Motor vehicle Registration No KAM 853C to the Petitioner.”

9.Annexed to the Application is a letter dated May 22, 2015 from Chief George M. Nyamai of Kiboko Location, Makindu Division stating that the piece of land in Kibwezi vested to the Applicant is known as Kiboko ‘B’ Settlement Scheme Plot Number 232 and 1260. This is evidence of the discovery of a new and important matter which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or the order made.

10.Further the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment on June 5, 2020, and the Applicant filed this instant Application on September 15, 2020. In my view the application was filed timeously.

11.The upshot is that the Application meets the conditions for granting review. I hereby allow the Application dated September 15, 2020. Costs be in the Cause.It is so ordered.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4^TH DAY OF JULY, 2023E.K. OGOLAJUDGE

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Case Search

Civil Suit 24 of 2006

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options