Mang Hotel & another v Mose & 13 others (Cause 267 of 2014) [2023] KEELRC 1312 (KLR) (26 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation:
[2023] KEELRC 1312 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Cause 267 of 2014
NJ Abuodha, J
May 26, 2023
Between
Mang Hotel
1st Applicant
Timothy Kinuthia
2nd Applicant
and
Peter Kimeu Mose
1st Respondent
Joseph Nthiwa Nzioki
2nd Respondent
Anthony Kariuki Gichohi
3rd Respondent
Sylvester Kyalo Mutio
4th Respondent
Anne Wambui Wanyokie
5th Respondent
Cyrus Mwaura Mbugua
6th Respondent
Lilian Wambui Gachoka
7th Respondent
William Nthiani Kithuka
8th Respondent
Stanley Githinji Mwangi
9th Respondent
James Angulu Ndakala
10th Respondent
Martin Nzioka Kitumbi
11th Respondent
Judy Mweru Gathogo
12th Respondent
Francis Munyevi Ndonye
13th Respondent
Joseph Kariuki Rugiri
14th Respondent
Ruling
1.The applicant sought a review of this Court’s ruling delivered on 9th February, 2023 ( Mbaru J) in which the learned Judge ordered that the decretal sum be deposited in a joint interest earning account held by both parties within the next 30 days.
2.The applicants pray that the order of the learned Judge be substituted with an order directing that the applicant do deposit a renewable Banker’s Guarantee of the decretal sum being Kshs.2,417,422.15 in the name of M/S Lucy Njiru & Company Advocates pending the hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. E880 of 2022.
3.According to the applicant, their application dated 22nd November, 2022 did not seek such an order therefore the learned Judge must have made an error granting a prayer the applicants never sought. The applicant further stated that the application before the learned Judge was made by the applicants seeking to provide security for the decretal sum pending appeal or in the alternative they be allowed to deposit a Banker’s Guarantee for the amount. It was not an application for stay of execution in which the Court could impose conditions.
4.The applicant also stated that the Appeal had undergone case management directing the parties to file their respective submissions in 30 days.
5.The Court has perused the application dated 22nd November, 2022 and is persuaded that it is indeed correct that the applicant never sought the orders which the Court ultimately granted. This was obviously an error on the face of the record which the Court has power under its review jurisdiction to correct. The application dated 13th February, 2023 is therefore hereby allowed to the extent that the order of the learned Judge issued on 9th February, 2023 be and is hereby substituted with an order directing that the applicant do deposit a renewable Banker’s Guarantee of the decretal sum being Kshs.2,417,422.15 in the name of M/S Lucy Njiru & Company Advocates pending the hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. E880 of 2022.
6.Costs to abide the outcome of the Appeal.
7.It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI ON THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2023ABUODHA J. N.JUDGEIn the presence of:-M/s Njiru for the ClaimantTimothy for the Respondent