Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020

Help

Advanced search Help

Advanced Search mode is suitable for finding a particular case when you have details that describe the case at hand e.g. (names of parties, case number, case year etc).
To find a case according to its meta data (names of parties, case number, and date of delivery, case year etc) one need not fill in all the fields. You may use any one or more search criteria; search using whatever information you have..

Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020

Google Custom Search
Advanced Search

Download: PDF Download Original Source Document Download Show Metadata

Mire v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020) [2023] KEHC 2584 (KLR) (27 March 2023) (Ruling)

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020
Parties:	Mire v Republic
Date Delivered:	27 Mar 2023
Case Class:
Court:	High Court at Garissa
Case Action:	Ruling
Judge(s):	John Nyabuto Onyiego
Citation:	Mire v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020) [2023] KEHC 2584 (KLR) (27 March 2023) (Ruling)
Advocates:	Mr. Kihara for State
Court Division:	Criminal
County:	Garissa
Advocates:	Mr. Kihara for State
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Mire v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020) [2023] KEHC 2584 (KLR) (27 March 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2584 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Garissa

Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020

JN Onyiego, J

March 27, 2023

Between

Khalif Aden Mire

Applicant

and

Republic

Respondent

Ruling

1.Vide a Chamber summons filed on 29-7-2020, the applicant sought leave to appeal out of time. He however, paid the fine imposed by the Lower court on 23-3-2021. Since then, he has never appeared to prosecute his application.

2.It would appear that he has no interest in the matter. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution and the file therefore closed.

RULING READ, DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 27^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023.J. N. ONYIEGOJUDGEIn the Presence of:Mr. Kihara for the state.Martin/ Mohamed- Court Assistants.Applicant - Absent.J.N. ONYIEGOJUDGE

Download PDF Download Original Source Document Download

Please enter advanced search options

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Except for some material which is expressly stated to be under a specified Creative Commons license, the contents of this website are in the public domain and free from any copyright restrictions

Case Search

Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 2020

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options