Gidion v Amollo & 10 others; Commission for Integration and National Cohesion & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E079 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 2282 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (27 March 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation:
[2023] KEHC 2282 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Petition E079 of 2023
HI Ong'udi, J
March 27, 2023
Between
Hon.Mike Sonko Mbuvi Gidion
Petitioner
and
Odinga Raila Amollo
1st Respondent
Musyoka Kalonzo Stephen
2nd Respondent
Jeremiah Kioni
3rd Respondent
Martha Wangari Karua
4th Respondent
Eugene Ludovic Wamalwa
5th Respondent
Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Coalition
6th Respondent
Wiper Democratic Party
7th Respondent
George Luchiri Wajackoya
8th Respondent
Wycliffe Ambetsa Oparanya
9th Respondent
The Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government
10th Respondent
Inspector General of Police
11th Respondent
and
The Commission for Integration and National Cohesion
Interested Party
The Governor, Nairobi City County
Interested Party
Council of Governors
Interested Party
Ruling
1.Today morning this Court granted the petitioner leave to amend his Petition and Notice of Motion both dated March 20, 2023. By the same breath the Court ordered that the said amended petition and Notice of motion be deemed as duly filed. Mr Ng’eno for the 9th Respondent also confirmed having been served with the amended pleadings alongside the application seeking leave to amend.
2.Mr Kinyanjui for the petitioner is now asking the Court to issue the following conservatory orders exparte.a.Inciting, instigating, or promoting any unlawful conduct in furtherance of, or incitement of such public gatherings convened by them at any time in compliance with Section 5(1) of the Public Order Act.b.In any way hindering, hampering, preventing or interfering with any means of public service conveyance including the loading, transportation and delivery of any product and/or service by any service delivery company or Officer of any Department of the Government of Kenya, or otherwise howsoever interfering with service delivery in any part of Kenya by any person;c.Placing and/or burning tyres on any highway, road, pavement, easement, pathway, premises (whether private or public), or otherwise however blocking the ingress and egress form any such stated places;d.Blocking, obstructing or obscuring any and all entrance, whether to public or private premises, pedestrian or vehicular on, or at any public way and any building, place or conveyance to which, for the time being, the public are entitled or permitted to have access either without any condition or upon condition of making any payment, and any building place which is for the time being used for any public or religious meetings or assembly of the public;e.Attending at any department or officer of the Government of Kenya’s premises at any time either alone or in the company of more than 2 persons comprising a crowd of their supporters, within a radius of 5 Kilometers, save for the purpose of the 1st to 9th respondents (and any of their servants, agents, and/or employees) presenting themselves at such premises for the execution of any request for services in accordance with the laid down procedures for the respective Departments for the delivery of such services.7 Leave be granted to the applicant to advertise such orders as are made in these proceedings and service thereof on the cited Respondent’s in a daily newspaper of national circulation, pursuant to Rule 23(3) of Legal Notice 117 of 2013.
3.The application is based on the following grounds:i.The call for mass action countrywide has caused a lot of disruptions, affecting a number of people not participating in the demonstrations. He submits that a number of businesses, schools, properties etc have been affected.ii.Counsel argues that every Kenyan has a right to protection of the law which this court should uphold.iii.There are other dates slated for mass action, and Kenyans will continue suffering.
4.Mr. Ng’eno for the 9th respondent submitted that the amended pleadings had just been admitted and he would respond once he gets instructions from his clients.
5.I have considered the submissions by Mr Kinyanjui alongside the orders that the Petitioner seeks.Prayer No 4AAs earlier indicated when this matter was filed, there is a set procedure on declaration of public holidays in Kenya. What happens when the procedure is not followed? That is the reason why we have the Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Interior & Coordination of National Government and the Inspector General of Police. It is not for this court to direct these two senior Government officers on their mandate or on who to arrest and who not to arrest.We have a principle known as separation of powers.Prayers 5B & 5D
6.Section 5 of the Public Order Act Revised Edition 2018 clearly sets out Regulations of Public meetings and Processions. No person is allowed a public meeting or a public procession except in accordance with the provisions of the said section. The Regulating Officer must be notified and given all details of the meeting or procession.
7.Who then is a Regulating Officer? The Act defines him/her as follows:
8.Sections 6 and 11 of the Act prohibit possession of offensive weapons at public meetings and processions.
9.Enforcement of all these provisions falls within the docket of the security enforcement officers. It is the duty of the Regulating Officers and their seniors to ensure compliance with the law as set out to avoid infringement of the rights of Kenyans.
10.This is also set out under Section 5 (6) (7), (8), (9), (10), (11). It would therefore not be proper for this Court to appear to be setting out new Regulations which is not within its docket.
11.At this stage I do not find the prayer for conservatory orders to be merited. Let the officers concerned carry out their lawful mandate. Application is declined.
Orders accordingly
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 27TH DAY MARCH 2023 IN OPEN COURT AT MILIMANI NAIROBI.H. I. ONG’UDIJudge of the High Court