Kariuki & another v CEC Nyandarua County & 7 others (Constitutional Petition E012 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 16665 (KLR) (21 December 2022) (Judgment)
Neutral citation:
[2022] KEHC 16665 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Constitutional Petition E012 of 2021
CM Kariuki, J
December 21, 2022
Between
James Gacheru Kariuki & another
Petitioner
and
CEC Nyandarua County & 7 others
Respondent
Judgment
1.By a petition dated 1st December 2021, the petitioners sort the following reliefs;
2.The Petitioner complains that All Nyandarua County Appropriations Bills and/or Acts have not been published in Kenya Gazette in line with Article 199(1) Constitution and thereafter in County Gazette if need be, which need is given Section 23 and 25 (2) Bills of County Government Act No. 17 of 2012. Thus, the Respondent has been Acting irregularly, illegally, and unconstitutionally.
3.Thus, Petitioner could not participate in tendering process to be paid under any Nyandarua County Assembly Legislations.
4.That there is no Nyandarua County Gazette under Article 183(1) b of the Constitution as read with County Gazette in Provisions of Section 2 of County Government Act No. 17 of 2012.
5.According to the Petitioner, Section 23 of the County Government Act (supra) provides County Assembly shall be published by including the Bill as Supplement in County Gazette and the Kenya Gazette, thus, can take effect after that in terms of Article 199(1) of the Constitution in default of that same is void for all the intent and purposes abinitio.
6.Thus, the aforementioned breaches rendered all that has been borne under Legislations subject herein null and avoid abinitio as a consequence and thus violating a multiple for fundamental rights pleaded by the Petitioner that entitling Petitioner to be compensated with damages sought in Petition.
7.The 204-page Petition and Bundle of documents attached thereto inform of submissions rather than a pleading which, if it were not for that Petitioner acting in person, same would have attracted striking out or expunging a bulk of its paragraph if not entire record host of documents for violating the rules of pleadings and being argumentative rather than pleading the fact but the law and arguments.
8.The Petition is supported by a supporting affidavit and a supplementary Affidavit sworn by James Gacheru Kariuki on 24th May 2022.
9.Respondents 1,3 and 6 filed an affidavit sworn by Joseph Mugo Gachambi on 10th March 2022 along/together with submissions dated 19th May 2022 to oppose the petition.
10.The 2nd and 4th Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 25th May 2022 to oppose the Petition and also filed submissions dated 19th July 2022.
11.5th Respondent filed grounds of opposition along with submissions dated 23rd May 2022 to oppose Petition.
12.The 7th Respondent filed submissions dated 31st May 2022 to oppose the Petition. The Petitioners also filed a further supplementary Affidavit sworn on 4th June 2022. The 8th Respondent filed submissions dated 19th July 2022 to oppose the Petition. Petitioner also filed submissions dated 24th May 2022.
13.The court gave directions that the petition be canvassed via submissions.
14.Summarily, the petitioners assert that pursuant to and/or under the provisions of Section 23 of the County Government Act No. 17 of 2012, a Nyandarua County Assembly Bill shall only take effect upon it being included as a supplement in a Nyandarua County Gazette and in the Kenya Gazette (in line with provisions of Article 199 (1) of the Constitution of Kenya.
15.Any document purporting to have been or to be a Nyandarua County Assembly Appropriation Bill that has not been included as a supplement in a Nyandarua County Gazette and the Kenya Gazette is void ab initio.
16.That the Annual Appropriation Bill of Nyandarua County Assembly is a county legislation that cannot take effect without the same being published in the Kenya Gazette and in a Nyandarua County Gazette “whichever comes earlier” unless the legislation stipulates a different date and/or time at which it shall come into force.
17.Reliance was placed on James Gacheru Kariuki & 3 Others v Attorney General & 11 Others [2017] eKLR
18.The petitioners asserted that the Annual Nyandarua County Appropriation Act is invalid because the 1st and 2nd respondents’ failure to establish a Nyandarua County Gazette since 2013 makes it impossible to have a Nyandarua County Appropriation Act that has taken effect.
19.The issues that the petitioner intends to be determined are: -
20.The core issue or epicentre of the instant Petition is whether failure to publish County legislation in County renders same invalid and of no legal effect plus costs.
21.In summary, the Petition in James Gacheru Kariuki & 3 Others vs. Attorney General & 11 Others [supra] challenged the constitutionality of several Kiambu County legislations, which the Petitioners maintained that they had not been published in the Kenya Gazette as mandated by the Constitution. Justice Lenaola pronounced himself on the status of county legislation that has not been published in the Kenya Gazette. He stated that the Constitution specifically provides for the publication of legislation in the Kenya Gazette for that legislation to take effect in line with Article 199(1) of the Constitution and thereafter in the County Gazette if necessary. He further noted that the concept of a ‘County Gazette’ was introduced by the County Governments Act of 2012. The Constitution explicitly requires County legislation to be published in the Kenya Gazette for them to take effect.
22.He also averred that Section 25(2) of the County Government Act is unconstitutional because it states that county legislation can come into force without necessarily being published in the Kenya Gazette. Yet, the only Gazette contemplated by the Constitution is the Kenya Gazette. This led to the invalidation of legislation.
23.Further, in Republic vs. Kiambu County Executive Committee & 3 others exparte James Gacheru Kariuki & 9 others [2017] eKLR, Justice Joel Ngugi echoed the sentiments by asserting that any notices published in the County Gazette without first having been published in the Kenya Gazette are null.
24.Section 25 of the County Governments Act provides as follows;
25.Article 199 of the Constitution on publication of county legislation stated that: -
26.Article 260 states that: -In this Constitution, unless the context requires otherwise— “Gazette” means the Kenya Gazette published by the authority of the national government or a supplement to the Kenya Gazette;
27.Further, in the County Government of Kiambu v Kariuki & 3 others (Civil Appeal 137 of 2017) [2021] KECA 351 (KLR), the Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court’s decision by holding that the Constitution explicitly requires county legislation to be published in the Kenya Gazette for the same to take effect. County legislation ought to be published in the Kenya Gazette to gain legitimacy.
28.In my view, the petitioner’s attempt to distinguish between a supplement to and/or the Kenya Gazette of and the Kenya Gazette is fruitless and a misinterpretation of the law as they are one and the same thing according to Article 260 of the Constitution. Within the ordinary meaning, a supplement means a thing added to something else in order to complete or enhance it. Supplemental means completing or making an addition to, in this case, the Kenya Gazette and does not denote something that is completely different from the Gazette. There was no material difference between the supplement to the Kenya gazette and the Kenya gazette as was held in James Gacheru Kariuki & 3 Others v Attorney General & 11 Others [supra]
29.In addition, the High Court, in the aforementioned case, distinguished the publication of legislation in the Kenya Gazette and the County Gazette. The Court rendered itself as follows: -
30.Accordingly, although the County Governments Act dictates that county legislation should be published in both the Kenya Gazette and County Gazette, the legislation only gain legitimacy after being published in the Kenya Gazette or a supplement to the Kenya Gazette.
31.Consequently, the Nyandarua County legislations from 2018-2021, including the Nyandarua County Appropriation Act, were published in the supplement to the Kenya Gazette and are, therefore legitimate and take effect. The law does not envisage a position where the same could be illegitimate only because of the failure to publish in the Nyandarua County Gazette. The Constitution explicitly required county legislation to be published in the Kenya Gazette for the same to take effect. In any case, those that were not published in the Kenya gazette can be regularized by the county, as was the finding in the James Kariuki Case on legislation in Kiambu County.
32.As stated earlier, the County Governments Act provides for additional publications of County legislation in the County Gazette. Still, such publications must have met the constitutional requirement of publications in the Kenya Gazette for the effectiveness of such legislation. Therefore, the publication in the County Gazette does not supersede that of the Kenya Gazette; the latter is a constitutional requirement and thus is mandatory in nature as opposed to publishing in the County Gazette, which in my view, is not a mandatory requirement.
33.In my finding, the petition has no merit, and thus the court makes the following orders-.i.The petition is thus dismissed for want of merit.ii.No orders as to costs as it is a matter of public interests.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT NYAHURURU THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022.CHARLES KARIUKIJUDGE