Civil Appeal 88 of 2000

Help

Advanced Search mode is suitable for finding a particular case when you have details that describe the case at hand e.g. (names of parties, case number, case year etc).
To find a case according to its meta data (names of parties, case number, and date of delivery, case year etc) one need not fill in all the fields. You may use any one or more search criteria; search using whatever information you have..

Download: Original Source Document Download Show Metadata

Manchester Outfitters (Suiting Division) Limited Now called King Woollen Mills Limited & another v Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited & another (Civil Appeal 88 of 2000) [2022] KECA 1401 (KLR) (16 December 2022) (Judgment)

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Civil Appeal 88 of 2000
Parties:	Manchester Outfitters (Suiting Division) Limited Now called King Woollen Mills Limited & another v Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited & another
Date Delivered:	16 Dec 2022
Case Class:
Court:	Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case Action:	Judgment
Judge(s):	Milton Stephen Asike-Makhandia, Sankale ole Kantai, Pauline Nyamweya
Citation:	Manchester Outfitters (Suiting Division) Limited Now called King Woollen Mills Limited & another v Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited & another (Civil Appeal 88 of 2000) [2022] KECA 1401 (KLR) (16 December 2022) (Judgment)
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Neutral citation: [2022] KECA 1401 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Court of Appeal at Nairobi

Civil Appeal 88 of 2000

MSA Makhandia, S ole Kantai & P Nyamweya, JJA

December 16, 2022

Between

Manchester Outfitters (Suiting Division) Limited Now called King Woollen Mills Limited

1^st Appellant

Galot Industries Limited

2^nd Appellant

and

Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited

1^st Respondent

AD Gregory & CD Cahill

2^nd Respondent

This decision is still being processed. Click here to download the original source document.

Download Original Source Document Download

Please enter advanced search options

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Except for some material which is expressly stated to be under a specified Creative Commons license, the contents of this website are in the public domain and free from any copyright restrictions

Case Search

Civil Appeal 88 of 2000

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options