Please Wait. Searching ...
Nyangau v Wagaki (Environment & Land Case 239 of 2014) [2022] KEELC 15180 (KLR) (6 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation:
[2022] KEELC 15180 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Environment & Land Case 239 of 2014
NA Matheka, J
December 6, 2022
Between
Peter O Nyangau
Plaintiff
and
Njeri Njau Wagaki
Defendant
Ruling
1.The application is dated February 10, 2022 and is brought under section 5 of the Judicature Act cap 8, order 52 rules 2 & 3 of the Supreme Court of England, section 3A and section 63 of the Civil Procedure Act and order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 seeking the following orders;1.That the respondent Njeri Njau Wagaki be ordered and directed to forthwith surrender to this honourable court original title No 477/1X/M1.2.That the respondent Njeri Njau Wagaki be committed to civil jail for contempt of the orders issued by this honourable court on 1st March.3.That the costs of this application be borne by the respondent.
2.It is based on the grounds that the respondent having been served with court orders issued in Mombasa ELC No 239 of 2014 has flagrantly disobeyed the same. That the respondent has refused and/or neglected to surrender the original title No 477 /IX/MI to court as ordered by this honourable court. That in the circumstances the respondent should be committed to civil jail for willful disobedience of express court orders. That it is only fair and just the respondent be directed to forthwith release and surrender to this honourable court the original title No 477/1X/MI and obey the terms of the orders granted by this honourable court on March 1, 2021. That this honourable court has the jurisdiction to hear 
and grant the orders sought in the motion filed herein.
and grant the orders sought in the motion filed herein.
3.The application was served but the respondent failed to file any response or attend court. The Black’s Law Dictionary (ninth edition) defines contempt of court as:
4.This application is anchored on section 63 (c) of the Civil Procedure Act which provides that;
5.Pursuant to section 63(c) aforesaid, it is provided under order 40 rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules that;
6.In the case of Teachers Service Commission vs Kenya National Union of Teachers & 2 others (2013) eKLR the court stated as follows;
7.Contempt of court is a grave matter as it concerns the dignity of the court when law and order is threatened and the fact that liberty and fundamental rights and freedoms of the alleged contemnor are at stake. The standard of proof is higher than proof on a balance of probabilities but not as high as proof beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of Republic vs Ahmad Abolfathi Mohammed & another (2018) eKLR, the Supreme Court stated as follows:
8.In the instant case the respondent having been served with court orders issued in Mombasa ELC No 239 of 2014 has flagrantly disobeyed the same. The respondent has refused and/or neglected to surrender the original title No 477 /IX/MI. The applicant states that in the circumstances the respondent should be committed to civil jail for willful disobedience of express court orders. That it is only fair and just the respondent be directed to forthwith release and surrender to this honourable court the original title No 477/1X/MI and obey the terms of the orders granted by this honourable court on March 1, 2021. The application was not opposed. I find that this application is merited and I make the following orders;1.That the respondent to comply with the court order issued on June 14, 2019 within the next 60 (sixty) days after service of this order failure of which the will be cited for contempt and be directed to pay a fine of Kshs 50,000/= each and in default, the respondent to be committed to civil jail for a period of one (1) month.2.The respondent to pay the costs of this application.It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MOMBASA THIS 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022.N.A. MATHEKAJUDGE
