Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | Civil Appli 51 of 2005 |
|---|---|
| Parties: | GETRUDE CHAO WAITA v PETER KINYUA MUCHENDU |
| Date Delivered: | 28 Jul 2006 |
| Case Class: | Civil |
| Court: | Court of Appeal at Mombasa |
| Case Action: | |
| Judge(s): | Riaga Samuel Cornelius Omolo, Samuel Elikana Ondari Bosire, John walter Onyango Otieno |
| Citation: | GETRUDE CHAO WAITA v PETER KINYUA MUCHENDU [2006] eKLR |
| Case History: | (Application to strike out the notice of appeal from a ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Sergon J.) dated 27th June, 2003 in H.C.C.C. NO.72 of 2003 |
| Case Summary: | [Ruling] Civil Practice and Procedure -appeal - application for an order to strike out an appeal - omission of documents from the record of appeal - documents which are not of a primary nature may be included through a supplementary record of appeal with the leave of the court - court of appeal not concerned with approving the correctness of the order appealed from which is drawn by the High Court - Court of Appeal Rules rules 80, 85(1)(h), 89(1) - Civil Procedure Rules Order 20 rule 7 |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
Civil Appli 51 of 2005
GETRUDE CHAO WAITA ……………………………………….. APPLICANT
AND
PETER KINYUA MUCHENDU …………….……….…………. RESPONDENT
(Application to strike out the notice of appeal from a ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Sergon J.) dated 27th June, 2003
in
H.C.C.C. NO.72 of 2003
************
RULING OF THE COURT
This is an application under rule 80 of the Court of Appeal Rules seeking an order striking out an appeal which is not identified in the motion.
That being the case and in absence of the record of appeal relating to it, we are unable to appreciate the issues raised. Besides, even if the record were available, the reasons given for seeking to have that appeal struck out do not fall within the ambit of rule 80 of the Rules of this Court.
It is also quite clear to us that documents which are not of primary nature, if they are omitted from the record of appeal, they may be put by way of a supplementary record with leave of the court in the case of the appellant, and by the respondent pursuant to rule 89(1) of the Rules.
As for the form and contents of an order appealed from, under O.XX rule 7, of the Civil Procedure Rules, it is not the function of this Court to approve the correctness or otherwise of an order drawn by the superior court. Rules 85(1)(h) of the Rules merely requires that the record of appeal includes copy of a certified order from which an appeal is preferred, which, the respondent says he did.
In the result this application has no merit and is accordingly dismissed with costs.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 28th day of July, 2006
R.S.C. OMOLO
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S.E.O. BOSIRE
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J.W. ONYANGO OTIENO
……………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Please Wait. Searching ...