Cause 303 of 2019

Case Metadata
Case Number:	Cause 303 of 2019
Parties:	Kirimi v Sameer Africa Limited
Date Delivered:	23 Jun 2022
Case Class:	Civil
Court:	Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Case Action:	Ruling
Judge(s):	MN Nduma
Citation:	Kirimi v Sameer Africa Limited (Cause 303 of 2019) [2022] KEELRC 112 (KLR) (23 June 2022) (Ruling)
Advocates:	Mr. Mungla for the Claimant, Mr. Kamau for the Respondent
Court Division:	Employment and Labour
County:	Nairobi
Advocates:	Mr. Mungla for the Claimant, Mr. Kamau for the Respondent
Disclaimer:	The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Kirimi v Sameer Africa Limited (Cause 303 of 2019) [2022] KEELRC 112 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (23 June 2022) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 112 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi

Employment and Labour

Cause 303 of 2019

MN Nduma, J

June 23, 2022

Between

Gabriel M. Kirimi

Claimant

and

Sameer Africa Limited

Respondent

Ruling

1.By a Notice of Motion dated 10^th January, 2022, the applicant seeks leave of the Court to amend his statement of Claim dated 3^rd May, 2019 in terms of the draft amended statement of claim annexed to the application marked GK1.

2.The amendments are said to be necessary to concisely place claimant’s case and bring forth all issues for eventual determination by the Court. That the intended amendments are not prejudicial to the respondent and are in the interest of justice.

3.The application is opposed by the respondent vide grounds of opposition dated 20^th January, 2022 to wit that they introduce a new cause of action; are statute barred; have been brought after inordinate delay and are prejudicial to the respondent.

4.Both parties filed written submissions and the Court having considered depositions and submissions by both parties is guided by the decision in the case of Central Kenya Limited -vs- Trust Bank Limited [2002] 2 E.A. 365 where it was held: -“… .a party is allowed to make such amendments as may be necessary for determining the real question in controversy or to avoid a multiplicity of suits,(a)provided there has been no undue delay,(b)that no new or inconsistent cause of action is introduced,(c)that no vested interest or accrued legal right is affected and(d)That the amendment can be allowed without injustice to the other side.”

5.This suit was filed on 13^th May, 2019 and responded to by the respondent and the claimant filed statement of agreed issues on 9^th August, 2019 to wit: -(1)Whether the claimant’s employment was unlawfully terminated.(2)Whether the claimant is entitled to damages and the quantum thereof.(3)What should be the order on costs.

6.This application as earlier said is dated 10^th January, 2022 and the proposed amendment in the attached draft may be outlined as follows:-(i)At paragraph 3 is intended to introduce a new phrase “a consolidated gross salary of Kshs 160,000 per month.”The salary had not been stated in the original statement of claim.(ii)Introduction of a new paragraph 3A to wit;“The respondent in demonstrable bias, malice and bad faith, failed to consider sufficiently or at all the special audit report on the lost products which report was tendered at the hearing before the disciplinary committee and thereby arrived at wrong decision.”(iii)Particulars of bias, malice and bad faith have been amended by deleting paragraphs 4; 4(a) (b) and (c)(iv)The reliefs sought by the claimant are substantively the same the only amendment sought being to replace the phrase: -“Claimant’s dismissal was unfair and unlawful” with the phrase “the respondent’s decision to terminate the claimant’s employment was without merit, unfair and unlawful.”

7.It is the Court’s considered decision that the amendments sought only seek to put the particulars of the claim in a more precise manner without introducing any new cause of action. Though the amendment sought may have been sought earlier than it was, the Court finds that the amendments sought do not prejudice the respondent in a manner that cannot be remedied by way of costs since the respondent will be afforded opportunity to file amended statement of defence and the matter proceed to trial thereafter.

8.The Court therefore finds that the amendments sought fall within the guidelines set out in Central Kenya Limited case(supra).

9.The application is granted and the filed draft amended statement of claim deemed to have been duly filed and served subject to payment of requisite fees. Costs shall be in the cause.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI (VIRTUALLY) THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022.MATHEWS N. NDUMAJUDGEAppearancesMr. Mungla for claimantMr. Kamau for RespondentEkale – Court clerk

Case Content:		Subject:
Case Number:		Parties:
Judge:		Court:
	Delivery Date Range:
From:		To:

Case Search

Case Metadata

Please enter advanced search options