Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Tribunal Case E035 of 2021 |
---|---|
Parties: | Lilian Wambui Waigwa v Judy Jepchirchir Towett & Petrocelli Lina Chepkemoi and Allexie Chebet Towett |
Date Delivered: | 06 Jan 2022 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Business Premises Rent Tribunal |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI CHAIRMAN |
Citation: | Lilian Wambui Waigwa v Judy Jepchirchir Towett & another [2022] eKLR |
Advocates: | Miss Wairimu for the Tenant |
Court Division: | Tribunal |
Parties Profile: | Individual v Individual |
County: | Nakuru |
Advocates: | Miss Wairimu for the Tenant |
History Advocates: | One party or some parties represented |
Case Outcome: | Suit directed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
VIEW PARK TOWERS 7TH & 8TH FLOOR
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. E035 OF 2021 (NAKURU)
LILIAN WAMBUI WAIGWA..........................................................TENANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
JUDY JEPCHIRCHIR TOWETT................................LANDLORD/1ST RESPONDENT
PETROCELLI LINA CHEPKEMOI AND
ALLEXIE CHEBET TOWETT...................................LANDLORD/2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The 2nd Respondent’s notice of motion dated 18th May 2021 seeks review of the orders issued on 27th April 2021 requiring the Tenant to continue paying rent for the suit premises as usual to the Landlady/1st Respondent pending the hearing and determination of the application dated 21st April 2021. It also seeks an order that all the rent for the suit premises be deposited at the Tribunal pending the hearing and determination of the main cause longed by the Tenant herein.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Alexie Chebet Towett. I have read the same. I have also read the application by the Tenant dated 21st April 2021.
3. I also note that the main contention in this dispute is as to who the Landlord to the Tenant is and where the rent should be deposited. The Tenant’s application dated 21st April 2021 has not been heard and concluded. No final orders have issued in the said application. If the Tribunal were to vary the orders issued by Hon Chege on 27th April 2021, it would not have dealt with the substance of the Tenant’s application.
4. I do also note that the 2nd Respondent has sought to have the rent payable by the Tenant over the suit premises deposited with the Tribunal.
5. The application by both parties are therefore intertwined and determining the 2nd Respondent’s application in isolation will have far reaching effects on the Tenant’s application.
6. The best direction that the applications ought to take in the premises is one where both applications are heard and determined at the same time.
7. Consequently, I will order that the application dated 21st April 2021 and the one dated 18th May 2021 will be heard together and a determination thereof made at the same time. Counsel for the parties are ordered to file their respective submissions in both applications within the next fourteen days of this ruling.
8. All previous directions in this matter are varied to that extent. The interim orders in place will remain in force.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY BY HON CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI THIS 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022 IN THE PRESENCE OF MISS WAIRIMU FOR THE TENANT AND IN THE ABSENCE OF THE OTHER PARTIES.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL