Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Case E035 of 2021 |
---|---|
Parties: | Republic v Amos Kibuthu Ngige |
Date Delivered: | 16 Dec 2021 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Kiambu |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Mary Muhanji Kasango |
Citation: | Republic v Amos Kibuthu Ngige [2021] eKLR |
Advocates: | For DPP :- Ms. Kathambi/Mr Kasyoka For Accused: - Mr. Marube |
Court Division: | Criminal |
County: | Kiambu |
Advocates: | For DPP :- Ms. Kathambi/Mr Kasyoka For Accused: - Mr. Marube |
History Advocates: | Both Parties Represented |
Case Outcome: | Accused granted bond |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KIAMBU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. E035 OF 2021
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC.....................................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
AMOS KIBUTHU NGIGE....................................................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. AMOS KIBUTHU NGIGE is charged in this case with the offence of murder and he has sought from this Court he be released on bond/bail pending hearing of this case.
2. The bail application was not opposed by the State. According to the accused’s counsel, the alleged murder is connected to a family land feud over land. It would seem that some members of accused’s family are in favour of accused’s release on bond/bail whilst others are not. There is however no compelling reason to deny accused his prayer for bond/bail.
3. The primary consideration in granting bond/bail is to ensure the accused does attend trial. See the case REPUBLIC VS. ROBERT ZIPPOR NZILU (2018) eKLR as follows:-
“18. I associate myself with the view expressed by Muriithi, J in KELLY KASES BUNJIKA VS. REPUBLIC (supra) that:
‘It is clear that the primary consideration for bail is whether the accused will attend his trial for the charges facing him, and it must, therefore, be a compelling reason if it is demonstrated that “the accused person is likely to fail to attend court proceedings”. The question in this matter becomes whether there is, on a balance of probabilities evidence that the accused is likely to abscond. The accused claims to have a good defence to the charge of escape from custody. The nature of such defence and evidence is not disclosed. The accused merely asserts his “constitutional right to be granted Bond/Bail on reasonable and favourable terms.’
19. From the constitutional point of view, however, an accused person has the right to be released on bond or bail, on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial. This right can only be limited where it is shown that there exist compelling reasons not to be released.”
4. The accused’s prayer for bond/bail finds favour with the court. Accordingly, I grant the following orders:-
(a) The accused Amos Kibuthu Ngige is granted bond of Kshs.500,000/= and one surety of similar amount pending his trial.
(b) At reading of this Ruling, a hearing date will be fixed.
5. Orders accordingly.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Coram:
Court Assistant : Maurice
For DPP :- Ms. Kathambi/Mr Kasyoka
For Accused: - Mr. Marube
Accused : AMOS KIBUTHU NGIGE: present
COURT
RULING delivered virtually.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE