Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Application E411 of 2020 |
---|---|
Parties: | Milkah Mutheni Ndiku v Technik Diesel Limited |
Date Delivered: | 09 Jul 2021 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nairobi |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Patrick Omwenga Kiage |
Citation: | Milkah Mutheni Ndiku v Technik Diesel Limited [2021] eKLR |
Case History: | (An application to strike out the appeal filed by respondent on the 19th day of December 2019, E.L.R.C Appeal No. 65 of 2019 and the ruling and orders dated 23.9.2020 from the Judgment and Decree of the Chief Magistrate’s Court (Senior Resident Magistrate Hon. D.O. Mbenja) dated 26th day of April, 2019) in ELRC Cause No. 95 of 2018) |
Court Division: | Civil |
County: | Nairobi |
History Docket No: | ELRC Cause 95 of 2018) |
History Magistrate: | Hon. D.O. Mbenja - Senior Resident Magistrate |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
CORAM: KIAGE, J.A (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. E411 OF 2020
BETWEEN
MILKAH MUTHENI NDIKU.................................. APPLICANT
AND
TECHNIK DIESEL LIMITED..............................RESPONDENT
(An application to strike out the appeal filed by respondent on the 19th day
of December 2019, E.L.R.C Appeal No. 65 of 2019 and the ruling and orders
dated 23.9.2020 from the Judgment and Decree of the Chief Magistrate’s Court (Senior
Resident Magistrate Hon. D.O. Mbenja) dated 26th day of April, 2019) in ELRC Cause No. 95 of 2018)
********************
RULING ON URGENCY
Following my non-certification of the motion dated 16th December 2020 as urgent, the applicant who is in person has indicated that she is “not in agreement with the decision of a single Judge/Magistrate” and seeks to have it considered urgent and placed before a three Judge Bench in the interests of justice.
The motion I refused to certify urgent is, with respect, a curiosity that seeks to strike out an appeal filed, not before this Court, but one that was filed and is pending before the Employment and Labour Court. The description of the application, as captured in the title, speaks to its oddity.
I have restrained myself from making any comment on the motion beyond what I have stated. It is enough for me to say that nothing has been placed before me to change my mind. The application is not urgent and it shall be listed in the normal course of the business of the Court.
Order accordingly.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2021.
P. O. KIAGE
....................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a
true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR