Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | crim app 108 of 92 |
---|---|
Parties: | HERMAN AMBONYA ODONGO vs REPUBLIC |
Date Delivered: | 13 Jun 1994 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Kisumu |
Case Action: | |
Judge(s): | Johnson Evan Gicheru, Philip Kiptoo Tunoi, Richard Otieno Kwach |
Citation: | HERMAN AMBONYA ODONGO vs REPUBLIC [1994]eKLR |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & TUNOI)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 1992
BETWEEN
HERMAN AMBONYA ODONGO......................................APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC...................................................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at
Kakamega (Justice Osiemo) dated 14th October, 1992
in
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 359 OF 1991)
**********
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant was convicted of robbery contrary to
section 296(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 6 years
imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane, followed by police
supervision for 5 years. His appeal to the superior court
against both conviction and sentence was summarily rejected
under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He has
now appealed to this court against this rejection.
The only issue of law which could have arisen in any
appeal would have been the issue of identification on which
there is more than ample evidence to prove that the appellant was one of the assailants who attacked the complainant's wife and stole his radio. Although the radio was never recovered, the appellant and the second robber were traced through their foot marks to the house where they were apprehended.
In the end we are satisfied that the evidence in this
case is sufficient to support the conviction and there is no
material in the circumstances of the case which could raise a
reasonable doubt whether the conviction was right or lead this
court to the opinion that the sentence ought to be reduced.
The summary rejection was in the ultimate analysis correct and
we accordingly dismiss this appeal.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 13th day of June,
1994.
J. E. GICHERU
.........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
R. O. KWACH
........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P. K. TUNOI
.............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is
a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR.