Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | Criminal Petition 59 of 2019 |
|---|---|
| Parties: | Ahmed Shaban Odhiambo v Republic |
| Date Delivered: | 18 Dec 2019 |
| Case Class: | Criminal |
| Court: | High Court at Kisumu |
| Case Action: | Judgment |
| Judge(s): | Thripsisa Wanjiku Cherere |
| Citation: | Ahmed Shaban Odhiambo v Republic [2019] eKLR |
| Advocates: | Ms. Gathu for the State |
| Court Division: | Constitutional and Judicial Review |
| County: | Kisii |
| Advocates: | Ms. Gathu for the State |
| History Advocates: | One party or some parties represented |
| Case Outcome: | Petitioner re-sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 59 OF 2019
BETWEEN
AHMED SHABAN ODHIAMBO............................................................PETITIONER
AND
REPUBLIC...............................................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
Introduction
1. On 15th August, 2008, the trial court in NYANDO CRIMINAL CASE NO.1538 OF 2006, convicted and sentenced the Petitioner to death for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. Petitioner lodged an appeal KISUMU HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 124 of 2008 which was dismissed by a judgment dated 03rd August, 2010. The Petitioner does not appear to have appealed to the Court of Appeal.
2. The Petitioner has petitioned this court for resentencing. He expressed remorse and stated that he was arrested on 17th August, 2006 and has been in custody since then.
3. Ms. Gathu, Senior Prosecution Counsel for the state submitted that the offence was heinous and complainants were injured during the robbery and recommended that Petitioner be resentenced to 20 years.
Analysis and Determination
4. At the time of the petitioner’s conviction, death was the only available sentence for robbery with violence.
5. The Supreme Court’s decision in Francis Karioki Muruatetu & Another v Republic & 5 others [2016] eKLR declaring the mandatory death sentence unconstitutional has necessitated resentencing of all persons previously sentenced to the mandatory death sentence.
6. I have considered The Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016 and its application which is intended to promote transparency, consistency and fairness in sentencing (See Michael Kathewa Laichena & another v Republic [2018] eKLR).
7. Under the proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya), the court is entitled to take into account the period the petitioner has spent in custody in determining the sentence.
8. The complainant was robbed and wounded. The Petitioner has trained and achieved a certificate of participation in income generating projects.
9. Petitioner was a first offender. The court record shows that the petitioner has served 11 years and 4 months since the date of conviction. He is re-sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment from 15th August, 2008 when he was convicted.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU THIS 18th DAY OF December 2019
T. W. CHERERE
JUDGE
In the presence of-
Court Assistant - Amondi/Okodoi
Petitioner - Present in person
For the State - Ms. Gathu
Please Wait. Searching ...