Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Succession Cause 4 of 2015 |
---|---|
Parties: | In re Estate of James Kiwanuka (Deceased) |
Date Delivered: | 16 Oct 2015 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Kadhis Court at Kisumu |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Mursal.M.Sizi - kadhi |
Citation: | In re Estate of James Kiwanuka (Deceased) [2015] eKLR |
Court Division: | Family |
County: | Tana River |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE KADHIS COURT AT KISUMU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 4 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES KIWANUKA (DECEASED)
VS
BAKARI YUSUFU ......................................... .........APPLICANT
ASMAN MANJA................................RESPONDENT PETITIONER
RULING
The applicant through his application dated17th AUGST 2015 prayed for review of the judgment delivered on 2nd day of..JULY 2015 . His Further grounds was on the fact that:
1- The objector was never given a chance to participate in the said proceedings from the onset of the case.
2- The objector was never informed of the progress of the matter by the Respondent petitioner and only came to realize that the same had been concluded.
3- The Respondent petitioner cannot be the administrator of the plot because He is a son to a doughter. The late Jmes Kiwanuka Kawisa was severed by the following beneficiaries :
Mwanajuma Kiwanuka (Daughter) was survived by Asman Manja respondent petitioner Hidaya and others
Seki Sambu (son deceased) had no child.
Yusuf Kiwanuka survived by Lucia Adhiyambo( widow deceased ) Suleyman Yusuf and Beka Yusuf(applicant)
The judgment was issued basing on false information given to the court by the R respondent petitioner and same contravenes section of the law.
On the Other hand the Respondent Petitioner had no answer concerning the applicant's statement.
I have noted the Issue clearly and I found that the information given to the court by the petitioner was not truly. It is the duty of this court to Clarify and expound on these issues as follows:
HEIRS AND MODE OF DISTRIBUTION
under Islamic law, Each son is entitled to twice the share of the daughter under Qur'an:AL nisa : 11-12 (?????? ???? ?? ??????? ????? ??? ?? ????????) Allah enjoins you concerning your children: for the male is the equal of the portion of two females
The legal heirs and mode of distribution of the estate of James Kiwanuka are:
Mwanajuma Kiwanuka (Daughter) entitle 1/3
Yusuf Kiwanuka (son) entitle 2/3
IT IS HEREBY ORDEED THAT:
1- the applicant pointed as administrator of the estate.
2-It is clear to this court that the Plot NO 99 at Kaloleni Kisumu Town belong to the late James Kiwanuka and the applicant with his Sibling have a right to it as beneficiaries of the said estate.
3- The Applicant to pay for the house within 60 days from today.
4- The share for the responded petitioner and his siblings to be distributed among them by this court.
5- Must take out expenses of the valuation Shs15000 70000 of Savoy and 48780 of municipality.
6- ASMAN MANJA is hereby restrained from collecting rent with effect from NOVEMBER 2015.
These are orders of this court
R/ A -30 days
Read and delivered this..16th day of October, 2015 in the presence of
Mursal.M.Sizi---------kadhi
court Assistant-----Rehema Akidah