Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Cause 301 of 2017 |
---|---|
Parties: | Kenya National Union of Nurses v County Public Service Board Homabay |
Date Delivered: | 06 Dec 2018 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Mathews Nderi Nduma |
Citation: | Kenya National Union of Nurses v County Public Service Board Homabay [2018] eKLR |
Advocates: | Mr. John Karakacha for the Claimant/Applicant Mr. Nyauke for the Respondent |
Court Division: | Employment and Labour Relations |
County: | Kisumu |
Advocates: | Mr. John Karakacha for the Claimant/Applicant Mr. Nyauke for the Respondent |
History Advocates: | Both Parties Represented |
Case Outcome: | Application dismissed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT KISUMU
CAUSE NO. 301 OF 2017
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
KENYA NATIONAL UNION OF NURSES.................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
THE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD HOMABAY......RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. Application dated 15th February, 2018 and filed on even date seeks review of the ruling by Hon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango delivered by myself on 22nd December, 2017 on the grounds set out in the Notice of Motion on grounds that the court erred in law and fact in its ruling at paragraph 4 & 5 of the ruling in stating-
“I agree with the Respondent that there is no evidence of the authority to deduct union dues from the salaries of its members which under section 49 of the Act should be in form ‘S’ commonly referred to as the check off form.”
2. Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016, under which this application is brought reads –
33(1)A person who is aggrieved by a decree or an order from which an appeal is allowed but from which no appeal is preferred or from which no appeal is allowed, may within reasonable time, apply for a review of the judgment or ruling -
a. ………………
b. On account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record.
c. ……………..
d. For any other sufficient reason
3. The application is opposed vide a replying affidavit by the Respondent filed on 6th March, 2018.
4. The basis on which the review is sought is a finding of law and fact at page 5 of the ruling to the effect that there was no evidence adduced by the Applicant showing that Respondent had authority to deduct union dues from its employees by way of a “Check Off Form” duly filed, submitted and authorized by the Minister in terms of section 49 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007.
5. This as the Applicant correctly puts it was a finding of fact and law by the Hon. Judge. This finding may only be challenged by an Appeal to the Court of Appeal.
6. The Applicant cannot invite this court to make a contrary finding of fact and law to that already made by the trial Judge. This is wanting to have a second bite on the cherry as it were through the back door.
7. It is the court’s finding that no valid grounds have been disclosed by the Applicant to warrant review or setting aside of the ruling by Hon. Maureen Onyango delivered on 1st February, 2018.
8. Disputes of fact and law in this matter may however be canvassed and concluded in the main suit in which similar prayers as were sought in the dismissed application are made.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in Kisumu this 6th day of December, 2018
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Appearances
Mr. John Karakacha for Claimant/Applicant
Mr. Nyauke for Respondent
Chrispo – Court Clerk