Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | civil appl no. nai. 331 of 96[1] |
---|---|
Parties: | AMOS LEITATO KISHOYIAN & 4 OTHERS vs KEROKE OLE NKOITIKO & 11 OTHERS |
Date Delivered: | 02 May 1997 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Court of Appeal at Nairobi |
Case Action: | |
Judge(s): | A B Shah |
Citation: | AMOS LEITATO KISHOYIAN & 4 OTHERS vs KEROKE OLE NKOITIKO & 11 OTHERS[1997]eKLR |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: SHAH J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 331 OF 1996
BETWEEN
AMOS LEITATO KISHOYIAN & 4 OTHERS....................APPLICANTS
AND
KEROKE OLE NKOITIKO & 11 OTHERS......................RESPONDENT
(Application for leave to file an appeal out of time and
file and serve Notice of Appeal out of time in an
intended appeal from ruling of the High Court of
Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Justice Aganyanya) dated 31st
July, 1996
in
H.C.C.C. NO. 1705 OF 1996
R U L I N G
This is a most unsatisfactory application. It took some minutes for applicant's counsel to even `fish' out the notice of appeal, to show to me that the same was filed on 5th August, 1996. On being asked if a copy of the letter bespeaking the copies of the proceedings was sent to the respondent's advocates counsel for the applicant said no. The ruling which is sought to be appealed against is not dated. The reasons for such ruling, given later, do not have a date also. The mandatory requirements of order 20 rule 3(1) as held with order 20 rule 7(b) have not been complied with. The application before me gives no inkling to me as to what it is all about. Plaint and defence in the superior court are not before me. Nor is the application which was dismissed by the learned judge.
I do not intend to exercise my discretion under rule 4 in view of the slip-shod manner in which this application is before me. It is struck out with costs.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 2nd day of May, 1997.
A.B. SHAH
.....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR