Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Suit 261 of 2004 |
---|---|
Parties: | FULCHAND M. SHAH v PANACHAND J SHAH & OTHERS |
Date Delivered: | 28 Apr 2006 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division) |
Case Action: | |
Judge(s): | Mary Muhanji Kasango |
Citation: | FULCHAND M. SHAH v PANACHAND J SHAH & OTHERS [2006] eKLR |
Case Summary: | [RULING] Summons-service-where the defendants are outside the court’s jurisdiction-whether leave should be granted to effect service
|
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Civil Suit 261 of 2004
FULCHAND M. SHAH……………………......……………………PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
PANACHAND J SHAH & OTHERS ………………...………DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The plaintiff’s chamber summons application dated 16th march 2006 is brought under Order V Rule 21, 21 A (c) and 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The plaintiff seeks leave of this court to serve the summons on the 4th and 6th Defendants out of this court’s jurisdiction.
The plaintiff in his supporting affidavit stated that he instructed investigators to carry out investigation on the whereabouts of the said defendants and the investigator found that the said defendants are residents of the United Kingdom.
Having considered the plaint the court finds that this action falls within the categories of actions in Order V Rule 21 and therefore summons can be allowed to be effected outside this court’s jurisdiction.
The court will therefore grant the following orders: -
(1) That leave is hereby granted to the plaintiff to serve summons upon the 4th and 6th defendants out of the court’s jurisdiction.
(2) The 4th and 6th defendant will enter an appearance in this matter within 30 days of service of summons.
(3) The costs of the chamber summons dated 16th March 2006 shall be in the cause.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered this 28th April 2006.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE