Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | Environment and Land Civil Appeal 51 of 2017 (Formerly Meru Elc Civil Appeal 133 of 2013) |
|---|---|
| Parties: | Pia Kabuu v Peter Kinyua Mutiga |
| Date Delivered: | 14 Dec 2017 |
| Case Class: | Civil |
| Court: | Environment and Land Court at Meru |
| Case Action: | Ruling |
| Judge(s): | Peter Muchoki Njoroge |
| Citation: | Pia Kabuu v Peter Kinyua Mutiga [2017] eKLR |
| Advocates: | none mentioned |
| Court Division: | Land and Environment |
| County: | Tharaka Nithi |
| Advocates: | none mentioned |
| Case Outcome: | Suit dismissed |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 51 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU ELC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2013
PIA KABUU………………………………………………...…….APPELLANT
VERSUS
PETER KINYUA MUTIGA………………..………………… RESPONDENT
RULING
1. When the parties were to come to court on 14.12.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 42 rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up. The matter had been listed for dismissal before me.
2. I am satisfied that the apposite notice was properly issued.
3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 42 rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit, therefore, merits dismissal.
4. The suit is dismissed.
5. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 14th day of December, 2017 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Parties not in court
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE
Please Wait. Searching ...