Please Wait. Searching ...
|Case Number:||Environment and Land Case Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2017 (Formerly Meru Elc Miscellaneous Application Case 68 of 2011)|
|Parties:||Republic v Chairman Muthambi Division Land Dispute Tribunal Ex-parte Loyford Njagi Mwiandi|
|Date Delivered:||20 Dec 2017|
|Court:||Environment and Land Court at Chuka|
|Judge(s):||Peter Muchoki Njoroge|
|Citation:||Republic v Chairman Muthambi Division Land Dispute Tribunal Ex-parte Loyford Njagi Mwiandi  eKLR|
|Court Division:||Land and Environment|
|Case Outcome:||suit dismissed|
|Disclaimer:||The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information|
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION CASE NO. 08 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU ELC MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION CASE NO. 68 OF 2011
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AGAINST MUTHAMBI DIVISION LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL
IN THE MATTER OF MUTHAMBI DIVISION LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 22 OF 2010
IN THE MATER OF LAND PARCEL NO. MUTHAMBI/GATUA/463
LOYFORD NJAGI MWIANDI……...................………….….EX-PARTE APPLICANT
CHAIRMAN MUTHAMBI DIVISION LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL.….RESPONDENT
ANTONY MURITHI M’ITHARI………......................……........INTERESTED PARTY
1. When the parties were to come to court on 20.12.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up.
2. I am satisfied that the apposite Notice was properly issued.
3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17rule 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The suit, therefore, merits dismissal.
4. The suit is dismissed.
5. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 20th day of December, 2017 in the presence of:
Parties not in court