Please Wait. Searching ...
|Case Number:||Civil Appeal 58 of 2017|
|Parties:||M’ndaka Kajiumia M’mbirithi v Erastus Kiruja Riungu|
|Date Delivered:||14 Dec 2017|
|Court:||High Court at Meru|
|Judge(s):||Peter Muchoki Njoroge|
|Citation:||M’ndaka Kajiumia M’mbirithi v Erastus Kiruja Riungu  eKLR|
|Court Division:||Land and Environment|
|Case Outcome:||Suit Dismissed.|
|Disclaimer:||The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information|
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 58 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU ELC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 02 OF 2013
M’NDAKA KAJIUMIA M’MBIRITHI...........................APPELLANT
ERASTUS KIRUJA RIUNGU............................RESPONDENT
1. When the parties were to come to court on 14.12.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 42 rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up. The matter had been listed for dismissal before me.
2. I am satisfied that the apposite notice was properly issued.
3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 42 rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit, therefore, merits dismissal.
4. The suit is dismissed.
5. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 14th day of December, 2017
in the presence of:
Parties not in court