Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Election Petition 12 & 10 of 2017 (Consolidated ) |
---|---|
Parties: | Chris Munga N. Bichage, Zaheer Jhanda & James F. O Kenani v I.E.B.C , Julius Meja Okeyo (Returning Officer) & Richard Nyagaka Tongi |
Date Delivered: | 18 Dec 2017 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Kisii |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Anthony Ndung'u Kimani |
Citation: | Chris Munga N. Bichage & 2 others v I.E.B.C & 2 others [2017] eKLR |
Court Division: | Civil |
County: | Kisii |
Case Outcome: | Application allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
ELECTION PETITION NO. 12 OF 2017
(CONSOLIDATED WITH ELECTION PETITION NO. 10 OF 2017)
IN THE MATTER OF ELECTIONS ACT, 2011
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTIONS (PARLIAMENTARY AND COUNTY ELECTION) PETITION RULES, 2017
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR MEMBER OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR NYARIBARI CHACHE CONSTITUENCY
BETWEEN
CHRIS MUNGA N. BICHAGE …….……..........…..….….…..… 1ST PETITIONER
ZAHEER JHANDA ……………………….......…………..…..… 2ND PETITIONER
JAMES F. O KENANI ……………………….......………..…….. 3RD PETITIONER
VERSUS
I.E.B.C ………………………………………………...........….... 1ST RESPONDENT
JULIUS MEJA OKEYO (RETURNING OFFICER) .…...........… 2ND RESPONDENT
RICHARD NYAGAKA TONGI ……………………….......……. 3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
This Court did pronounce itself in respect of evidence sought to be relied on by the 2nd and 3rd Petitioner on 5/12/2017.
Under paragraph 67 of the ruling the Court stated;
“With the result that documents marked “C” and “B1” do not comply with the mandatory provisions of Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Rules, the Court makes an order that the same be expunged from the record.....”
Rule 12 (5) (6) and (7) of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules are clear on the mode of presentation of evidence in an election petition. This is vide affidavits and it is obvious that any evidence to be relied on will be a fact within the knowledge of a witness or through an annexture to the affidavit aforesaid.
When such an annexture is expunged, the same Court cannot go behind its own orders to admit the same.
In view of my orders of 5/12/2017 the 2nd and 3rd Petitioner are precluded from reliance on the expunged documents.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in Kisii this18th day of December, 2017.
A. K. NDUNG'U
JUDGE