Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | Cause 286 of 2014 |
|---|---|
| Parties: | Veronica Ruguru Wamaitha v Board of Governors, Blesco House Girls B School |
| Date Delivered: | 31 Jul 2017 |
| Case Class: | Civil |
| Court: | Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru |
| Case Action: | Ruling |
| Judge(s): | Radido Stephen Okiyo |
| Citation: | Veronica Ruguru Wamaitha v Board of Governors, Blesco House Girls B School [2017] eKLR |
| Advocates: | For Claimant Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago & Muchela Advocates, For Respondent Mr. Kisilah instructed by Sheth & Wathigo, Advocates |
| Court Division: | Employment and Labour Relations |
| County: | Nakuru |
| Advocates: | For Claimant Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago & Muchela Advocates, For Respondent Mr. Kisilah instructed by Sheth & Wathigo, Advocates |
| History Advocates: | Both Parties Represented |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 286 OF 2014
VERONICA RUGURU WAMAITHA...........................CLAIMANT
v
BOARD OF GOVERNORS,
BLESCO HOUSE GIRLS B SCHOOL................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. For determination is a motion dated 7 April 2017 by the Respondent seeking
1. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to dismiss the suit with costs for want of prosecution.
2. THAT in the alternative this Honourable Court be pleased to strike out this suit with costs on the ground that the Claim has abated.
3. THAT the costs of this application be provided for.
2. According to an affidavit of service sworn by Kisilah Daniel Gor, Advocate, the motion was served upon the firm of Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago & Muchela Advocates on 21 June 2017, and the said firm acknowledged service.
3. When the application was called out for hearing on 21 June 2017, the Claimant was not present nor were her advocates on record in Court.
4. The Court, being satisfied that the application was served allowed the application to be prosecuted.
5. In essence, the motion is unopposed as the Claimant failed or neglected to file any grounds of opposition or replying affidavit to disclose what steps have been taken to get letters of administration.
6. The Court notes that Mr. Wekhomba had informed it on 10 March 2015 that the Claimant had died and that the Court granted liberty to file amended Memorandum of Claim once letters of administration had been granted.
7. In this respect, one of the grounds relied on by the Respondent was that the cause of action had abated.
8. It is correct that no action has been taken 2 years after the Court granted liberty to the Claimant through the advocates on record to progress the Cause for hearing and on that ground the Court will allow the motion by the Respondent in terms of Order 2 as prayed.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 31st day of July 2017.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Murimi, Ndumia, Mbago & Muchela Advocates
For Respondent Mr. Kisilah instructed by Sheth & Wathigo, Advocates
Court Assistant Nixon/Martin
Please Wait. Searching ...