REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE

SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 72 OF 2006

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LOTUNGWA ARAP SANG (DECEASED)

CHRISTOPHER KIPKORIR LOTUNGWA...........PETITIONER

VERSUS

ALBERT KIMELI..................................................1ST OBJECTOR

MARY JEPKOECH KIPLAGAT........................2ND OBJECTOR

JOHN KIPCHUMBA KIPLAGAT......................3RD OBJECTOR

AND

MOSES KIMAIYO..............................1ST INTERESTED PARTY

LETEMA KIPSANG...........................2RD INTERESTED PARTY

KIMAGUT KIPSANG.......................3RD  INTERESTED PARTY

 DIRECTIONS

The court has  perused the entire proceedings herein, Earlier, the court was of the view that the issues  of distribution of the deceased estate was purely between the objectors and the applicants but upon perusing the proceedings it has emerged that there is the question of whether the interested parties have a share in the suit property as  their protest seemed to suggest. This was an issue which was not raised or determined earlier own when the objection proceedings were taken not and the ruling nullifying the grant delivered.

Were the court to proceed with the  distribution of the estate then the objectors whose protest is already on record will suffer prejudice. For whatever reasons and although the objectors want them to be excluded as they did  not participate in the objections proceedings, this  court cannot wish then away.

They cannot be sent away from the mercy seat. They have to be heard.

Succession proceedings and for that matter our constitution under Article 159 provides that their rights ought to be determined either way. The fundamental question is whether the deceased was holding the suit property in trust fro them or othrwise.

Needless to say all the parties shall still have the chance and opportunity to have their issues ventilated.  It is however regretted that these proceedings have taken such along time.

Consequently the ruling on distribution is differed . The matter of distribution should  be heard by way of Viva voce evidence on priority basis.

Orders accordingly.

Delivered  this 5^th day of December 2016.

__________________

H.K. CHEMITEI

JUDGE

In the presence of;

Gacathi for Marube for interested parties

Khisa for Kiarie for objectors.

Kirong – Court Assistant