Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Environment & Land Case 144 of 2016 |
---|---|
Parties: | Joshua Karuti M'erimba v Elizabeth Mwothabuambi, Francis M'thirari M'mungania Baimula District Land Adjudication Settlement Officer, Igembe Sub-County The District Land Registrar Igembe Sub-County & Attorney General |
Date Delivered: | 14 Sep 2016 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Environment and Land Court at Meru |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Peter Muchoki Njoroge |
Citation: | Joshua Karuti M'erimba v Elizabeth Mwothabuambi & 5 others [2016] eKLR |
Advocates: | Mutembei for Plaintiff |
Court Division: | Land and Environment |
County: | Meru |
Advocates: | Mutembei for Plaintiff |
History Advocates: | One party or some parties represented |
Case Outcome: | Prayer 3 is granted |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CASE NO. 144 OF 2016
JOSHUA KARUTI M'ERIMBA.....................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ELIZABETH MWOTHABUAMBI.....................................1ST DEFENDANT
FRANCIS M'THIRARI.....................................................2ND DEFENDANT
M'MUNGANIA BAIMULA...............................................3RD DEFENDANT
DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION
SETTLEMENT OFFICER, IGEMBE SUB-COUNTY.......4TH DEFENDANT
THE DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR
IGEMBE SUB-COUNTY..................................................5TH DEFENDANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL....................................................6TH DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
1. This application is dated 29/082016 and seeks orders: -
1. That the application herein be certified as urgent and be heard exparte in the 1st instance.
2. THAT the Honourable Court be pleased to issue temporary order of injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd defendants themselves, employees, agents, representatives, family or any person acting on their behest from constructing,entering ,dealing or in any other way interfering with the Plaintiff user and occupation of land parcel No. Naathu/Naathu/3325 or part of it referred by the defendants as parcel No. Naathu 4675 pending the hearing and determination of this application or until further orders of the Court.
3. THAT the honourable Court be pleased to issue temporary order of injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd defendants themselves , employees, agents, representatives, family or any other acting on their behest from constructing, entering ,dealing or in any other way interfering with the Plaintiff user and occupation of land parcel No. Naathu/Naathu/3325 on part of it referred by defendants as 4675 parcel No. Naathu/Naathu /4675 pending the hearing and determination of this suit or until further orders of this Court.
4. Costs be in cause.
2. The Application is supported by the Affidavit of JOSHUA KARUTI M'ERIMBA, the Applicant, and has the following grounds:-
1. THAT the Plaintiff is the beneficial, rightful, the registered and the legal owner of land parcel No. Naathu/Naathu/3325.
2. THAT the Plaintiff got ownership of land parcel No. Naathu/Naathu/3325 from his late father one NTOERIMBA THILANGE who gave him the same in the year early 1990's and he has been using it since then to date.
3. THAT the 1st defendant illegally and fraudulently colluded with the office of the 4th and 5th Defendants into registering the 1st defendant as a joint owner of parcel No. Naathu/Naathu/3325 without the knowledge and consent of the plaintiff.
3.When the Application was slated for interpartes hearing on 13/09/2016, the Defendants/ Respondents were not in Court.
4. Advocate Mutembei for the Applicant told the Court that the parties were properly served with the date for interparties hearing. He referred the Court to the apposite Affidavit of service. He asked the Court to allow the application.
5. In the absence of the Defendants/Respondents and despite serve, the application is deemed allowed.
6. Prayer 3 is granted.
7. Costs shall be in the cause.
8. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
CC: Lilian /Daniel
Miss Muna h/b Mutembei for Plaintiff
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE