Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Appeal 155 of 2013 |
---|---|
Parties: | Kochar Vishal & Vulcan Lab Equipment Limited v Republic |
Date Delivered: | 09 Mar 2016 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Luka Kiprotich Kimaru |
Citation: | Kochar Vishal & another v Republic [2016] eKLR |
Case History: | (An appeal arising out of the conviction and sentence of Hon. D.N. Mulekyo (Mrs.) – Ag. CM delivered on 28th August 2013 in Nairobi Anti-Corruption Case No.2 of 2010) |
Court Division: | Criminal |
County: | Nairobi |
History Docket No: | Anti-Corruption Case 2 of 2010 |
History Magistrate: | D.N. Mulekyo (Mrs.) – Ag. CM |
History County: | Nairobi |
Case Outcome: | Application Allowed. |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2013
(An appeal arising out of the conviction and sentence of Hon. D.N. Mulekyo (Mrs.) – Ag. CM delivered on 28th August 2013 in Nairobi Anti-Corruption Case No.2 of 2010)
KOCHAR VISHAL…….……………………………………………….....................1ST APPLLICANT
VULCAN LAB EQUIPMENT LIMITED.......................................................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………..………………………………………………….……........RESPONDENT
RULING
The Applicants applied to have the order freezing their Account No.0402703902 at Equatorial Commercial Bank formerly Southern Credit Bank to be unfrozen. This court, on appeal, exonerated the Applicants from any criminal liability from the charges that were brought against them. They were ordered to refund the sum of Kshs.70 million together with the accrued interest. This order was given by the court on 4th November 2015. However, it later emerged that the sum had already been refunded to the government on 1st October 2013. In the circumstances therefore, the order made by this court that the Applicants refund the money together with the accrued interest was in fact made without taking into consideration that the money had already been refunded at the time the court delivered the judgment. The Applicants have annexed a copy of the Electronic Money Transfer in the affidavit in support of the application as proof of the said refund. Mrs. Murungi submitted on behalf of the State that they should be given more time to confirm if the money was indeed refunded as claimed by the Applicants. From the application, it was evident that the Office of Director of Public Prosecution was aware of the information as far back as 18th November 2015. If the Office was diligent enough, the confirmation would have been obtained by now. This court sees no impediment in granting the Applicants’ application to have the frozen account unfrozen. In the premises therefore, the Applicants’ application dated 24th February 2016 is allowed in terms of Prayer 2 thereof.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2016
L. KIMARU
JUDGE