Case Metadata |
|
| Case Number: | Civil Case 73 of 2013 |
|---|---|
| Parties: | Philip Mururi Ndarua v Philip Mururi Ndarua |
| Date Delivered: | 10 Mar 2016 |
| Case Class: | Civil |
| Court: | High Court at Nyeri |
| Case Action: | Ruling |
| Judge(s): | John Muting'a Mativo |
| Citation: | Philip Mururi Ndarua v Philip Mururi Ndarua [2016] eKLR |
| Court Division: | Civil |
| County: | Nyeri |
| Case Outcome: | Court directs the appellant to take such steps as may be necessary to regularize the position. |
| Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CIVIL CASE NO 73 OF 2013
Philip Mururi Ndarua.......................................Appellant
versus
Gatemu Housing Society Ltd………….............Respondent
RULING
On 23 September 2015 I delivered a ruling allowing this Appeal to be reinstated after it had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The parties took a date for the hearing of the appeal on 7th December 2015 and on the said date the matter was listed before me for hearing. On the said date the appellant confirmed that he had filed written submissions while counsel for the Respondent asked for a mention date to confirm that he had filed his submissions. Pursuant thereto, the matter was listed for mention on 16th February 2016 and on the said date the Respondents counsel had not filed submissions. Judgement date was fixed for 10th March 2016.
Unfortunately, when I retired to write the judgement I noted that this appeal has pre-maturely been listed for hearing and certain crucial steps have never been taken. I find this to be unfortunate considering that this appeal was filed on 23rd September 2013 and the appellant only woke up after the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution by the court as stated above.
Order 42 rule 11 Civil Procedure Rules provides that:-
“Upon filing of the Appeal the Appellant shall within thirty days, cause the matter to be listed before a Judge for directions under section 79B of the Act”.
To date Order 42 Rule 11 Civil Procedure Rules has not been complied with. The directions under Section 79B of the Act would entail the admission or summary rejection of the Appeal. Directions under Order 42 rule 13(1) Civil Procedure Rules cannot be given before admission under section 79B Civil Procedure Act.
In brief this Appeal has never been admitted not withstanding that it was filed on 23rd September 2013. It follows that it would be improper for me to render a determination of the appeal under the above circumstances. Such a judgment, would, in my view be premature and open to legal challenge.
Accordingly, I direct the appellant to take such steps as may be necessary to regularize the position.
Orders accordingly
Dated at Nyeri this 10th day of March 2016
John M. Mativo
Judge
Please Wait. Searching ...