Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Succession Cause 7 of 2015 |
---|---|
Parties: | Bonfas Murigi Rutere v Julius Kamande Chomba |
Date Delivered: | 05 Nov 2015 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | High Court at Naivasha |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Christine Wanjiku Meoli |
Citation: | Bonfas Murigi Rutere v Julius Kamande Chomba [2015] eKLR |
Case History: | (Original Succession Cause No. 66 of 2013 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Engineer) |
Court Division: | Family |
County: | Nakuru |
History Docket No: | Succession Cause No. 66 of 2013 |
History County: | Nakuru |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIVASHA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 7 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CHOMBA RUTERE (DECEASED)
(Original Succession Cause No. 66 of 2013 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Engineer)
BONFAS MURIGI RUTERE.......................................................APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
JULIUS KAMANDE CHOMBA..........................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The gravamen of the Chamber Summons for revocation of grant filed on 12th January 2015 and respective affidavits of the Applicant is that the Applicant though conceding to the Petition was not called upon to give consent to the summons for the confirmation of the grant in Engineer Succession Cause Number 66 of 2013.
2. Secondly, he asserts that the distribution of the estate was adverse to the interest of some of the beneficiaries including himself, Peter Mwangi Chomba (late son of the deceased) and Cecilia Njoki Mwangi (daughter in law of the deceased).
3. In his sworn replies, the sole administrator of the estate Julius Kamande Chomba contends that the estate was distributed in accordance with the last wishes of the deceased. He concedes that Cecilia Njoki Mwangi is the wife of his late brother Patrick Mungai Chomba, therefore entitled and that, another brother Eliud Thuo Chomba died young.
4. From depositions and annextures filed, it is beyond disputing that the potentially entitled beneficiaries of the deceased were:
1. Bonfas Murigi Rutere - Son (Applicant)
2. Julius Kamande Chomba - Son
3. Tabitha Muthoni Chomba - Daughter
4. George Njuguna Chomba - Son
5. The wife or children of the late Peter Mwangi Chomba - Son
6. Njuguna Ngarachu - Purchaser
7. Cecilia Njoki Mwangi (wife of deceased Patrick Mungai Chomba, a son of the deceased - Daughter-in-law
8. Cecilia Njeri Mbugua - Daughter
5. It is also not in dispute that the deceased did not leave a will as contemplated by Section 9 and 10 of the Law of Succession Act. He therefore died intestate, yet, the distribution of the estate, according to the Respondent, was based on the alleged will of the deceased. The Petition was allegedly filed consequent to agreement between all the beneficiaries, save the family of the late Peter Mwangi Chomba. The assets of the estate are:
1. NAIVASHA/MARAIGUSHU BLOCK 1/448
2. NAIVASHA/MARAIGUSHU BLOCK 1/1303
3. NAIVASHA/MARAIGUSHU BLOCK 1/1307
6. There are no certified copies of title documents to confirm ownership or acreage of these properties. Further, while it is true that the Applicant withdrew a previous objection and cross-petition before the lower court, he did not grant consent to the confirmation of the grant; and the withdrawn objection related to the Petition but not the Summons for Confirmation.
7. In the view of all the foregoing, I am of the view that the confirmed grant dated 29th October, 2014 ought to be revoked which I hereby order. A rectified grant will be issued immediately in the names of the following beneficiaries:-
1. Bonfas Murigi Rutere - Son
2. Julius Kamande Chomba - Son
3. Tabitha Muthoni Chomba - Daughter
8. At the expiry of 6 months, the three administrators will be at liberty to jointly file summons for the confirmation of the grant, supported by 8 affidavits sworn by each of the identified beneficiaries, proposing the manner in which the estate property is to be distributed.
9. In the event that after 9 months of the issue of the grant in paragraph 7 above, the parties do not comply as above, the court will call up the file and give directions as it may deem fit in the matter. In the latter event, this file will be listed for mention in 2016. It is so ordered. Each party to bear its own costs.
Delivered and signed at Naivasha this 5th day of November, 2015.
In the presence of:-
The Applicant : In person
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gichuki D. K.
Court Clerk Stephen
C. W. MEOLI
JUDGE