Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Criminal Case 38 of 2015 |
---|---|
Parties: | Republic v Thomas Mbaabu M’Muga |
Date Delivered: | 09 Oct 2015 |
Case Class: | Criminal |
Court: | High Court at Meru |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Roseline Pauline Vunoro Wendoh |
Citation: | Republic v Thomas Mbaabu M’Muga [2015] eKLR |
Advocates: | Mr Mulochi for the State. Mr Kiogora for the Accused. |
Court Division: | Criminal |
Parties Profile: | Government v Individual |
Advocates: | Mr Mulochi for the State. Mr Kiogora for the Accused. |
History Advocates: | Both Parties Represented |
Case Outcome: | Application allowed. |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 38 OF 2015
REPUBLIC........................................................ PROSECUTOR
V E R S U S
THOMAS MBAABU M’MUGA ………………..……… ACCUSED
RULING
THOMAS MBAABU is charged with the offence of murder. He is alleged to have murdered his brother. He has filed an application seeking to be released on bond arguing that he has a Constitutional right to bond, is presumed innocent till proven guilty, and he is willing to abide by all conditions that the court may impose.
The State opposed the application through the affidavit of PC WILLIAM KIPRUTO, the Investigation Officer, who depones that the accused is likely to interfere with witnesses; that he is likely to be lynched because emotions are still high since the offence was committed recently.
The court called for a pre-bail report which I have considered together with the affidavits filed herein. The deceased was a brother to accused and the murder was a result of a long standing land dispute over ancestral land and that the family is divided into 2, those who want part of it sold and those against. From an interview of the administration there is no possibility of accused absconding and that he has been a person of good conduct save for the family feud; that he is unlikely to interfere with witnesses with whom he has a dispute. For the above reasons, I find that accused is not a flight risk nor is there any other compelling reason disclosed that would warrant this court to deny him bond. The court will therefore, allow the application and grant accused his own bond of KShs.300,000/= with one surety of the same amount. Accused is advised to abide by all terms of bond.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
R.P.V. WENDOH
JUDGE
9/10/2015
PRESENT
Mr. Mulochi for State
Mr. Igweta Holding Brief for Mr. Kiogora for Accused
Peninah, Court Assistant
Accused - present