Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Civil Case 129 of 2012 |
---|---|
Parties: | Muita Thiritkwa v Abdul Rahim Dawood |
Date Delivered: | 25 Nov 2014 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Environment and Land Court at Meru |
Case Action: | Ruling |
Judge(s): | Peter Muchoki Njoroge |
Citation: | Muita Thiritkwa v Abdul Rahim Dawood [2014] eKLR |
Advocates: | Rimita h/b Mwirigi for Plaintiff/Applicant Mutunga for Defendant/Respondent |
Court Division: | Land and Environment |
County: | Meru |
Advocates: | Rimita h/b Mwirigi for Plaintiff/Applicant Mutunga for Defendant/Respondent |
History Advocates: | Both Parties Represented |
Case Outcome: | Application allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENY AT MERU
HCC NO. 129 OF 2012
MUITA THIRITKWA..........................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ABDUL RAHIM DAWOOD...............DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
This application is dated 30th June, 2014 and seeks orders:
It has, inter alia, the following grounds:
(a) THAT for the full determination of the questions in controversy, there is need to amend the Plaint.
(b)THAT there is need of leave of the court to amend the Plaint since the pleadings are closed.
(c) THAT the proposed amendments will not prejudice the Defendant.
(d) THAT it is in the interest of justice that the Plaintiff be allowed to amend the Plaint.
During interpartes hearing on 25.11.2014 the parties, by consent, agreed to have the application allowed. In the circumstances, it is hereby allowed.
It is also directed as follows:
It is so ordered.
Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 25th day of November, 2014 in the presence of:
Cc. Daniel
Rimita h/b Mwirigi for Plaintiff/Applicant
Mutunga for Defendant/Respondent
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE