Case Metadata |
|
Case Number: | Election Petition 1 of 2013 |
---|---|
Parties: | Mohamed Dagane Osman v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & Abdi Osman Hassan |
Date Delivered: | 26 Aug 2013 |
Case Class: | Civil |
Court: | Election Petition in Magistrate Courts |
Case Action: | Order |
Judge(s): | Linus Kassan- PM |
Citation: | Mohamed Dagane Osman v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & another [2013] eKLR |
Advocates: | none |
Court Division: | Civil |
County: | Wajir |
Advocates: | none |
Case Outcome: | Application allowed |
Disclaimer: | The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information |
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT OF KENYA AT WAJIR
ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2013
MOHAMED DAGANE OSMAN …………………………..1ST PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES
COMMISSION…………………………………………………….1ST RESPONDENT
ABDI OSMAN HASSAN…………………………………………2ND RESPONDENT
Court: There is no appearance on the part of the petitioner or his advocate. There is no prove that they have complied with the elections Act. Today is on 26/8/13 and there is a deadline for deciding election petition cases. This is a very clear case of an advocate who has taken this court for granted. The petitioner had over a month to gazette the application to withdraw the case. The court has not seen any prove to that extend despite dealing with the matter severally. Under the circumstances I have no choice but to allow the application to withdraw this case. There are only fourteen (14) days before the deadline of deciding election petition. I shall order that these proceedings be typed and the matter be taken up by the chief registrar to see if action can be taken against the petitioners advocate for taking this court for granted. The application is allowed with costs to the 1st respondent. Petitioner to pay the costs.
Court: Assessment of bill of costs on 19/9/13.
Linus Kassan – PM
26/8/2013