Criminal law - robbery with violence - second appeal against conviction and sentence of death - Penal Code section 296(2)          

Constitutional law - rights of an accused person - language of the court - right to have the proceedings conducted in a language that he understands - right to an interpreter - duty of the trial court to record either the name of the person interpreting the proceedings or at least the nature of the interpretation - failure of the court to perform that duty - whether the appeal should be allowed - whether the case should be retried - Constitution section 77(2)(f)

Criminal Law – handling stolen property – appeal against conviction and sentence – appeal on the ground that the appellant was arrested at a different place from the place where the stolen goods were found and further that the house where the goods were found was not his – application opposed on the ground that the applicant ran away when he saw police approach the house where the stolen goods were found – where nobody saw the appellant stealing – whether the evidence on record was sufficient to support a conviction – Penal Code, section 322(2)

Family Law-marriage-dissolution of-grounds of cruelty-orders for custody and maintenance-whether the petitioner proved the matrimonial offences alleged-whether the marriage was irretrievably broken done

..

..

Criminal practice and procedure-rape-appellant charged and convicted on the offence of rape-appeal-appeal against conviction and sentence-grounds that the trial was presided over by three magistrates without observance of the mandatory provisions of the law-whether the appellate court should order a retrial-whether the appeal had merit-Penal Code section 140; Criminal Procedure Code section 200

[Ruling] Family Law-probate and administration-summons for revocation or annulment of grants of Letters of Administration intestate-grounds that the petitioner fraudulently obtained the grant in so far as she failed to disclose the fact that she was only one of the three wives of the deceased whom she failed to list as the survivors and probable beneficiaries of the deceased-claims that there had been no consent of the persons entitled to the representation-application was undefended-effect of-factors the court considers in such applications-whether the court had the mandate to revoke the grant issued