Advanced Search Results

Lunguton Vs Republic [2004] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. 414 Of 2001	Date Delivered: 27 Jan 2005

Judge: Muga Apondi, Luka Kiprotich Kimaru

Court: High Court at Nakuru

Parties: Julius Seurey Lunguton vs Republic

Advocates:

Citation: Lunguton vs Republic [2004] eKLR

robbery contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code,rape contrary to Section 140 of the Penal Code,breaking into a building and committing a felony contrary to Section 306(a) of the Penal Code,handling stolen property contrary to Section 322(2) of the Penal Code - trial found to be a nullity for being prosecuted by an unquaulified police officer as per the provisions of Section 85(2) and Section 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code - whether retrial should be ordered in the circumstances. EVIDENCE - IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE - WHAT CONSTITUTES POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION

Muasya V Republic [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Appeal 1047 of 2002	Date Delivered: 27 Jan 2005

Judge: Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit, Fred Andago Ochieng

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Philip Kioko Muasya v Republic

Advocates:

Citation: Muasya v Republic [2005] eKLR

Criminal Law - robbery with violence - identification - appellant identified by three witnesses in broad daylight - appellant arrested at the scene of the crime - appeal dismissed

MAKUU KILOLE & 2 Others V NZIOKA MBWII & 2 Others [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Appeal 118 of 1998	Date Delivered: 27 Jan 2005

Judge: Roseline Pauline Vunoro Wendoh

Court: High Court at Machakos

Parties: MAKUU KILOLE, MEME MAKUU & NYALITI MAKUU v NZIOKA MBWII, MANGUU KYULULI & KALA NZIOKA

Advocates:

Citation: MAKUU KILOLE & 2 others v NZIOKA MBWII & 2 others [2005] eKLR

Land - dispute over land - jurisdiction of the subordinate courts in land disputes - whether a subordinate court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application in a claim relating to land and proceedings governed by the Land Disputes Tribunal Act section 13(2)

Republic Vs Hungo [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Case 84 of 2003	Date Delivered: 27 Jan 2005

Judge: Hannah Magondi Okwengu

Court: High Court at Nyeri

Parties: Republic vs Priscilla Wanjiru Hungo

Advocates:

Citation: Republic vs Hungo [2005] eKLR

{ruling] criminal procedure - establishing of a prima facie case

Albert Gacheru Kiarie T/A Wamaitu Productions V Simon Muiruri Kirehu T/A One Step Nduti Music Store [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 566 of 2003	Date Delivered: 27 Jan 2005

Judge: Leonard Njagi

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Parties: Albert Gacheru Kiarie T/A Wamaitu Productions v Simon Muiruri Kirehu T/A One Step Nduti Music Store

Advocates:

Citation: Albert Gacheru Kiarie T/A Wamaitu Productions v Simon Muiruri Kirehu T/A One Step Nduti Music Store [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for reinstatement of interim orders of the court.

KENYA LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPERANUATION FUND V KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 301 of 2004	Date Delivered: 26 Jan 2005

Judge: Festus Azangalala

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Parties: KENYA LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPERANUATION FUND v KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY

Advocates:

Citation: KENYA LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPERANUATION FUND v KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY [2005] eKLR

INJUNCTION – temporary injunction – application for – applicant sought orders to restrain the respondent from disconnecting the power supply – where the applicant was disputing the amount to be paid to Kenya Power and Lighting Company - applicable principles – whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case

REGINA MUNYIVA NTHENGE V KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 65B of 2003	Date Delivered: 26 Jan 2005

Judge: Roseline Pauline Vunoro Wendoh

Court: High Court at Machakos

Parties: REGINA MUNYIVA NTHENGE v KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD

Advocates:

Citation: REGINA MUNYIVA NTHENGE v KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD [2005] eKLR

[Ruling] – INJUNCTION – temporary injunction – application for – applicant sought to restrain the respondent from selling the suit property – where the applicant had charged the property to the respondent and the respondent sought to reclaim the money – applicable principles – whether the respondent established a prima facie case

MORTGAGE – mortgagor’s right of redemption – where the applicant claimed that had they had adequate notice they would have exercised their right of redemption – where service was by post – factors the court considers in such applications - Registered Land Act (Cap 300) section 74 (1)

Samuel Muchiri W’Njuguna & 6 Others V Minister Of Agriculture [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Misc Civil Appli 621 of 2000	Date Delivered: 26 Jan 2005

Judge: Philip John Ransley

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Samuel Muchiri W’Njuguna & 6 others v Minister of Agriculture

Advocates:

Citation: Samuel Muchiri W’Njuguna & 6 others v Minister of Agriculture [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for stay of execution pending appeal from the decision of a taxing master - criteria for the grant of a stay

Winfred Muthoni Kariuki V George Ng’anga [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Suit 248 of 2003	Date Delivered: 26 Jan 2005

Judge: PJ Ransely J

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Winfred Muthoni Kariuki v George Ng’anga

Advocates:

Citation: Winfred Muthoni Kariuki v George Ng’anga [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Landlord and Tenant - protected tenancy - landlord seeking an order of eviction against the tenant - tenant claiming that he was a protected tenant and could not be evicted without an order the Business Premises Tribunal - whether the landlord should be restrained from unlawfully evicting the tenant.

In Re Jackson Muthiani Musyoka & Another [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Revision 1 of 2005[1]	Date Delivered: 26 Jan 2005

Judge: Roseline Pauline Vunoro Wendoh

Court: High Court at Machakos

Parties: In Re Jackson Muthiani Musyoka; Kilonzo Musyoka

Advocates:

Citation: In Re Jackson Muthiani Musyoka & another [2005] eKLR

[REVISION ORDER] Criminal Procedure - reference for revision of an order a subordinate court committing two accused persons to an approved school - accused person’s ages having been assessed at 16 and 17 years - trial magistrate later learning that the accused were in fact aged 19 and 18 years respectively - accused not admissible in the institution owing to their age - file referred back to the trial magistrate for the appropriate sentence to be meted