Loading
You searched for cases with the following details ; Filter
In The Matter Of An Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan V Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Misc Cause 818 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: David Kenani Maraga
Court: High Court at Mombasa
Parties: In the Matter of an Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd
Advocates:
Citation: In the Matter of an Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd [2005] eKLR
[Ruling] Arbitration Act Section 36 - application seeking leave to enforce arbitral award
Read More
William Olotch V Pan African Insurance Company Limited [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Case 255 Of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Festus Azangalala
Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Parties: William Olotch v Pan African Insurance Company Limited
Advocates:
Citation: William Olotch v Pan African Insurance Company Limited [2005] eKLR
Read More
Richard Odipo Othira V Sonyaco Sacco [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Case 298 Of 1997 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Kaburu Bauni
Court: High Court at Kisii
Parties: Richard Odipo Othira v Sonyaco Sacco
Advocates:
Citation: Richard Odipo Othira v Sonyaco Sacco [2005] eKLR
Read More
National Cereals & Produce Board V Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Suit 32 of 2005 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Mathew John Anyara Emukule
Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Parties: National Cereals & Produce Board v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd
Advocates:
Citation: National Cereals & Produce Board v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd [2005] eKLR
[RULING] Civil Procedure - amendment of pleadings - Civil Procedure Rules order VIA rule 7(1) - requirement that every pleading amended shall be endorsed with the date of the amendment and the date of the order allowing the amendment or the rule under which the amendment is made - whether the provision is mandatory and failure to comply with it would render an amended pleading incurably defective.
Read More
Gursharan Singh Brar T/a Kinal Saw Mills V Mathew Oseko[2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Case 1857 of 2001 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Festus Azangalala
Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)
Parties: Gursharan Singh Brar t/a Kinal Saw Mills v Mathew Oseko
Advocates:
Citation: Gursharan Singh Brar t/a Kinal Saw Mills v Mathew Oseko[2005] eKLR
[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for stay of execution pending appeal - grounds upon which a stay can be granted - duty of the applicant to bring the application without delay (laches)
Read More
Wilfred Kiura Mwangi V Harrison Mwangi Gacheche & Another [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Case 40 of 1998 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Daniel Kiio Musinga
Court: High Court at Nakuru
Parties: Wilfred Kiura Mwangi v Harrison Mwangi Gacheche, Lydia Wairimu Mwangi
Advocates:
Citation: Wilfred Kiura Mwangi v Harrison Mwangi Gacheche & another [2005] eKLR
Land law - sale of land - family land - land registered in the name of husband and occupied by his wife and children - sale of land by the husband to a third party - whether the sale was fraudulent because the husband had not disclosed to the Land Control Board that the land was occupied by his family - whether the Board would not have consented to the sale of the land if that fact had been disclosed by the seller
Read More
South Nyanza Sugar V Dalmas A. Mbogo [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Appeal 230 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Kaburu Bauni
Court: High Court at Kisii
Parties: South Nyanza Sugar v Dalmas A Mbogo
Advocates:
Citation: South Nyanza Sugar v Dalmas A. Mbogo [2005] eKLR
[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for stay of execution - Civil Procedure Rules Order 41 - a party can make an application for stay of execution to the appellate court even if a similar application was made in the trial court.
Read More
Republic V National Environment Management Authority & 2 Others Exparte Greenhills Investment Limited & 2 Others [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Misc Appli 169 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Joseph Gregory Nyamu
Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Parties: Republic v National Environment Management Authority (NEMA); Public Complaints Committee; City Council of Nairobi ex parte Greehnills Investments Ltd; Market Masters Ltd; Sugar Candy Ltd
Advocates:
Citation: Republic v National Environment Management Authority & 2 others exparte Greenhills Investment Limited & 2 others [2005] eKLR
[RULING] Civil Procedure - form of affidavits - objection to affidavits on the ground that they were not confined to facts which the deponent was able to prove of his own knowledge - that they related to contentious matters and which should not be deponed to by an advocate - Civil Procedure Rules order 18 rule 3 - whether points of objection had merit.
Read More
Republic V Chairman,Advocates Disciplinary Committee & Another Ex Parte Jafferson MS Nyagesoa [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Misc Appli 189 of 2004 |
Date Delivered: 23 May 2005 |
Judge: Kaburu Bauni
Court: High Court at Kisii
Parties: Republic v Chairman Advocates Disciplinary Committee; Secretary,Law Society of Kenya ex parte Jafferson M S Nyagesoa
Advocates:
Citation: Republic v Chairman,Advocates Disciplinary Committee & another ex parte Jafferson MS Nyagesoa [2005] eKLR
[RULING]Judicial review - application by advocate for an order of certiorari against the decision of the Advocates Disciplinary Committee to strike him off the roll of advocates and ordering him to make payment to the complainant - whether the applicant had been condemned unheard in breach of the rules of natural justice
Read More
Peter Odhiambo V Ali Bakari Helefi [2005] EKLR
|
Case Number: Civil Appeal 125 of 2003 |
Date Delivered: 20 May 2005 |
Judge: David Kenani Maraga
Court: High Court at Mombasa
Parties: Peter Odhiambo v Ali Bakari Helefi
Advocates:
Citation: Peter Odhiambo v Ali Bakari Helefi [2005] eKLR
Appeal - whether trial magistrate erred in dismissing the appellants claim against the defendant for careless driving - failure by trial court to take into consideration conviction of the respondent's driver - respondent found 100% liable by the appellate court
Read More
Please enter advanced search options