Advanced Search Results

In The Matter Of An Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan V Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Misc Cause 818 of 2004	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: David Kenani Maraga

Court: High Court at Mombasa

Parties: In the Matter of an Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd

Advocates:

Citation: In the Matter of an Arbitration Narottam Mulji Khatan v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd [2005] eKLR

[Ruling] Arbitration Act Section 36 - application seeking leave to enforce arbitral award

William Olotch V Pan African Insurance Company Limited [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 255 Of 2004	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Festus Azangalala

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: William Olotch v Pan African Insurance Company Limited

Advocates:

Citation: William Olotch v Pan African Insurance Company Limited [2005] eKLR

Richard Odipo Othira V Sonyaco Sacco [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 298 Of 1997	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Kaburu Bauni

Court: High Court at Kisii

Parties: Richard Odipo Othira v Sonyaco Sacco

Advocates:

Citation: Richard Odipo Othira v Sonyaco Sacco [2005] eKLR

National Cereals & Produce Board V Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Suit 32 of 2005	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Mathew John Anyara Emukule

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: National Cereals & Produce Board v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd

Advocates:

Citation: National Cereals & Produce Board v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - amendment of pleadings - Civil Procedure Rules order VIA rule 7(1) - requirement that every pleading amended shall be endorsed with the date of the amendment and the date of the order allowing the amendment or the rule under which the amendment is made - whether the provision is mandatory and failure to comply with it would render an amended pleading incurably defective.

Gursharan Singh Brar T/a Kinal Saw Mills V Mathew Oseko[2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 1857 of 2001	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Festus Azangalala

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Parties: Gursharan Singh Brar t/a Kinal Saw Mills v Mathew Oseko

Advocates:

Citation: Gursharan Singh Brar t/a Kinal Saw Mills v Mathew Oseko[2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for stay of execution pending appeal - grounds upon which a stay can be granted - duty of the applicant to bring the application without delay (laches)

Wilfred Kiura Mwangi V Harrison Mwangi Gacheche & Another [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 40 of 1998	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Daniel Kiio Musinga

Court: High Court at Nakuru

Parties: Wilfred Kiura Mwangi v Harrison Mwangi Gacheche, Lydia Wairimu Mwangi

Advocates:

Citation: Wilfred Kiura Mwangi v Harrison Mwangi Gacheche & another [2005] eKLR

Land law - sale of land - family land - land registered in the name of husband and occupied by his wife and children - sale of land by the husband to a third party - whether the sale was fraudulent because the husband had not disclosed to the Land Control Board that the land was occupied by his family - whether the Board would not have consented to the sale of the land if that fact had been disclosed by the seller

South Nyanza Sugar V Dalmas A. Mbogo [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Appeal 230 of 2004	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Kaburu Bauni

Court: High Court at Kisii

Parties: South Nyanza Sugar v Dalmas A Mbogo

Advocates:

Citation: South Nyanza Sugar v Dalmas A. Mbogo [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - application for stay of execution - Civil Procedure Rules Order 41 - a party can make an application for stay of execution to the appellate court even if a similar application was made in the trial court.

Republic V National Environment Management Authority & 2 Others Exparte Greenhills Investment Limited & 2 Others [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Misc Appli 169 of 2004	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Joseph Gregory Nyamu

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Republic v National Environment Management Authority (NEMA); Public Complaints Committee; City Council of Nairobi ex parte Greehnills Investments Ltd; Market Masters Ltd; Sugar Candy Ltd

Advocates:

Citation: Republic v National Environment Management Authority & 2 others exparte Greenhills Investment Limited & 2 others [2005] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Procedure - form of affidavits - objection to affidavits on the ground that they were not confined to facts which the deponent was able to prove of his own knowledge - that they related to contentious matters and which should not be deponed to by an advocate - Civil Procedure Rules order 18 rule 3 - whether points of objection had merit.

Republic V Chairman,Advocates Disciplinary Committee & Another Ex Parte Jafferson MS Nyagesoa [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Misc Appli 189 of 2004	Date Delivered: 23 May 2005

Judge: Kaburu Bauni

Court: High Court at Kisii

Parties: Republic v Chairman Advocates Disciplinary Committee; Secretary,Law Society of Kenya ex parte Jafferson M S Nyagesoa

Advocates:

Citation: Republic v Chairman,Advocates Disciplinary Committee & another ex parte Jafferson MS Nyagesoa [2005] eKLR

[RULING]Judicial review - application by advocate for an order of certiorari against the decision of the Advocates Disciplinary Committee to strike him off the roll of advocates and ordering him to make payment to the complainant - whether the applicant had been condemned unheard in breach of the rules of natural justice

Peter Odhiambo V Ali Bakari Helefi [2005] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Appeal 125 of 2003	Date Delivered: 20 May 2005

Judge: David Kenani Maraga

Court: High Court at Mombasa

Parties: Peter Odhiambo v Ali Bakari Helefi

Advocates:

Citation: Peter Odhiambo v Ali Bakari Helefi [2005] eKLR

Appeal - whether trial magistrate erred in dismissing the appellants claim against the defendant for careless driving - failure by trial court to take into consideration conviction of the respondent's driver - respondent found 100% liable by the appellate court