Advanced Search Results

NALIN NAIL WORKS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) V CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Suit 292 of 2005	Date Delivered: 28 Apr 2006

Judge: Murugi Geteria Mugo

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: NALIN NAIL WORKS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) v CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI

Advocates:

Citation: NALIN NAIL WORKS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) v CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI [2006] eKLR

[RULING] Injunctions-interlocutory-principles governing the grant of injunctions

Aden Sugow Ahmed V Elias Barre Shill & 2 Others [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Appeal 141 of 2003	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Samuel Elikana Ondari Bosire, Philip Nyamu Waki, William Shirley Deverell

Court: Court of Appeal at Nairobi

Parties: Aden Sugow Ahmed v Elias Barre Shill, Jama Hassan Ginni & Electoral Commission of Kenya

Advocates:

Citation: Aden Sugow Ahmed v Elias Barre Shill & 2 others [2006] eKLR

..

Zakayo Kimutai Kimeto V Republic [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Misc Crim Appli 12 of 2006	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Jeanne Wanjiku Gacheche

Court: High Court at Eldoret

Parties: Zakayo Kimutai Kimeto v Republic

Advocates:

Citation: Zakayo Kimutai Kimeto v Republic [2006] eKLR

[Ruling] Criminal Practice and Procedure - bail - anticipatory bail - application for bail pending arrest - statutory basis for anticipatory bail - circumstances in which anticipatory bail may be granted - applicant admitting that he had handled a motor vehicle suspected of being stolen - applicant seeking to prevent the police from arresting him - whether it would be proper for the court to cutrail the investigation powers of the police - duty of the applicant to demonstrate that his constitutional rights had been infringed - Constitution sections 70, 72(1); 84; Criminal Procedure Code section 123

Palace Drycleaners Ltd & Another V Kenya Power & Lighting & Co Ltd [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Suit 837 of 2000	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Alnashir Ramazanali Magan Visram

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Palace Drycleaners Ltd & another v Kenya Power & Lighting & Co Ltd

Advocates:

Citation: Palace Drycleaners Ltd & another v Kenya Power & Lighting & Co Ltd [2006] eKLR

[RULING] Order-setting aside-where the grounds cited by the applicant in support of the application have been considered and determined by several judges who have dealt with the file-whether the order should be set aside

Assumption Sisters Of Nairobi Registered Trustee V Stanley Kebathi, Arbitrator & Another [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Suit 497 of 2004	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Alnashir Ramazanali Magan Visram

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: Assumption Sisters Of Nairobi Registered Trustee v Stanley Kebathi, Arbitrator & David Kungu Gichuki t/a Complan Consulting Architects

Advocates:

Citation: Assumption Sisters Of Nairobi Registered Trustee v Stanley Kebathi, Arbitrator & another [2006] eKLR

[RULING] Civil Practice and Procedure-suits-reinstatement of suits-principles the court will consider-Civil Procedure Rules, Order IXB, rule 8

MUKUA TUTUMA V ALEX MUNENE TUTUMA & Another [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 96 of 2006	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: FRED A. OCHIENG

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Parties: MUKUA TUTUMA v ALEX MUNENE TUTUMA & RAPHAEL KIBIRU TUTUMA

Advocates:

Citation: MUKUA TUTUMA v ALEX MUNENE TUTUMA & another [2006] eKLR

[Ruling] CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE costs application for costs the plaintiff sought to have the first defendant in the suit to pay the costs the costs of the suit where there were no substantive prayers in the plaint against the first defendant the suit had already been settled between the plaintiff and the second defendant effect of whether the can order a party to pay of costs where that party had no substantive prayers sought against them

Josphat Kariuki Kamau V Pias Nungari Kamau & Another [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Appli 35 of 2006	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Philip Kiptoo Tunoi

Court: Court of Appeal at Nairobi

Parties: Josphat Kariuki Kamau v Pias Nungari Kamau & Ernest Mwaura Kamau

Advocates:

Citation: Josphat Kariuki Kamau v Pias Nungari Kamau & another [2006] eKLR

[Ruling] Civil Procedure – appeal – application for leave to file and serve notice and record of appeal out of time – delay of one year - duty of the applicant to give a satisfactory explanation for the delay - Court of Appeal Rules rule 4

K-REP BANK LTD V FRANCIS NGIGE NYOIKE & 2 OTHERS [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Civil Case 119 of 2005	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Festus Azangalala

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Parties: K-REP BANK LTD v FRANCIS NGIGE NYOIKE & 2 OTHERS

Advocates:

Citation: K-REP BANK LTD v FRANCIS NGIGE NYOIKE & 2 OTHERS [2006] eKLR

[RULING] Appeals-stay of execution-conditions to be satisfied by the applicant for the order to be granted-Civil Procedure Rules, Order XLI, rule 4(2)

VINCENT SHIVEKA BETI V REPUBLIC [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Appeal 896 of 2003	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Milton Stephen Asike-Makhandia

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: VINCENT SHIVEKA BETI v REPUBLIC

Advocates:

Citation: VINCENT SHIVEKA BETI v REPUBLIC [2006] eKLR

Criminal Law - attempted robbery with violence - appeal against conviction and sentence of death - analysis and re-evaluation of the evidence by the first appellate court - what constitutes the offence of attempted robbery - matters which the prosecution needs to establish in order to proof the offence - Penal Code section 297(2)

OKWARO GEORGE WILLIAM V REPUBLIC [2006] EKLR
Case Number: Criminal Appeal 902 of 2003	Date Delivered: 27 Apr 2006

Judge: Milton Stephen Asike-Makhandia

Court: High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Parties: OKWARO GEORGE WILLIAM v REPUBLIC

Advocates:

Citation: OKWARO GEORGE WILLIAM v REPUBLIC [2006] eKLR

Criminal Law-robbery with violence-ingredients of the offence-where no weapons were recovered but the complainant had sustained injuries in the robbery-whether the ingredients of robbery with violence were proven by the prosecution-Penal Code (cap. 63), Section 296(2)